evaluation · needs review

scGen: differentially expressed gene identification

Evaluation procedure

In-silico perturbation assessment with precision sampled at fixed 50% recall

Metadata review: needs review. Unreported conditions prevent automatic comparisons.

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Evaluated configurationMetricEvidence origin

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and finding	Coverage and uncertainty	Evidence
scGen: differentially expressed gene identification Model: scGen · Benchmark: differentially expressed gene identification · Dataset: stimulated immune PBMC In-silico perturbation assessment with precision sampled at fixed 50% recall Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review
0.91 precision at 50% recall Unit: fraction · Direction: unknown	Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAUPRC: a metric for evaluating the performance of in-silico perturbation methods in identifying differentially expressed genes · Table 3, CD14+Mono section, scGen row, Precision at 50% Recall column Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · Record review: needs review

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: evaluation-lit-b4-016

areas: cells-tissues
tasks: differentially expressed gene identification
origin: independent_paper
protocol: In-silico perturbation assessment with precision sampled at fixed 50% recall
version: Not reported
comparison: protocol id: Not reported; dataset version: Not reported; split: CD14+Mono; population: Not reported; inputs: Not reported; adaptation: Not reported; metric implementation: Not reported; aggregation: Not reported; budget: Not reported
missing metadata: model version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; dataset version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract

Related records