rewire.it
evaluation · needs review

PlantCAD2: cross-species conservation prediction

Evaluation procedure

Zero-shot score for conserved versus non-conserved sites from alignments of 35 Andropogoneae genomes

Model
PlantCAD2
Benchmark
cross-species conservation prediction
Dataset
Andropogoneae genome-wide conservation
origin
Author-reported evaluation
configuration
Not reported
protocol id
Not reported
dataset version
Not reported
split
Not reported
population
Not reported
inputs
Not reported
adaptation
Not reported
metric implementation
Not reported
aggregation
Not reported
budget
Not reported

Metadata review: needs review. Unreported conditions prevent automatic comparisons.

Evaluation results

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
PlantCAD2: cross-species conservation prediction

Zero-shot score for conserved versus non-conserved sites from alignments of 35 Andropogoneae genomes

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.725 AUROC

Unit: fraction · Direction: unknown

Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedPlantCAD2: A Long-Context DNA Language Model for Cross-Species Functional Annotation in Angiosperms · Table 1, Cross-species evolutionary conservation > Conservation within Andropogoneae (Genome-wide) row, PlantCAD2 AUROC entry

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · Record review: needs review

Download this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: evaluation-lit-b4-002

areas
dna-genomes
tasks
cross-species conservation prediction
origin
author_reported
protocol
Zero-shot score for conserved versus non-conserved sites from alignments of 35 Andropogoneae genomes
version
Not reported
comparison
protocol id: Not reported; dataset version: Not reported; split: Not reported; population: Not reported; inputs: Not reported; adaptation: Not reported; metric implementation: Not reported; aggregation: Not reported; budget: Not reported
missing metadata
model version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; dataset version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; split: not_reported_in_legacy_extract
Related records

Suggest a correction