Combined: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
Original 509 features vs ESM 1,280 features vs combined 1,789 features. 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples.
Evaluation procedure
Original 509 features vs ESM 1,280 features vs combined 1,789 features. 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples.
- Configuration
- Combined
- Protocol
- Protective-antigen classification feature comparison (vaccine-antigen candidate prediction)
- Dataset
- Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
- origin
- Author-reported evaluation
- configuration
- Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label
- protocol id
- paper-protocol-a7bf3c8f6b432c3093
- dataset version
- Not reported
- split
- 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples.
- subset
- Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
- population
- Not reported
- aggregation
- Not reported
- inputs
- Not reported
- adaptation
- Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label
- budget
- Not reported
- metric implementation
- Not reported
Metadata review: needs review. Unreported conditions prevent automatic comparisons.
Evaluation results
Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 1 evaluation · 7 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
| Metric and finding | Coverage and uncertainty | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Combined: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Configuration: CombinedProtocol: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison (vaccine-antigen candidate prediction)Dataset: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Original 509 features vs ESM 1,280 features vs combined 1,789 features. 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 0.85 ± 0.021 MCC Unit: dimensionless · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: type: reported plus minus type unresolved; value: 0.021 Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedEnhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Combined, column MCC; XML row4 column6 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 0.99 ± 0.004 Specificity Unit: fraction · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: type: reported plus minus type unresolved; value: 0.004 Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedEnhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Combined, column Specificity; XML row4 column4 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 0.97 ± 0.004 Weighted F1 Unit: fraction · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: type: reported plus minus type unresolved; value: 0.004 Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedEnhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Combined, column Weighted F1; XML row4 column5 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 0.97 ± 0.004 Val Accuracy Unit: fraction · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: type: reported plus minus type unresolved; value: 0.004 Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedEnhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Combined, column Val Accuracy; XML row4 column2 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 0.92 ± 0.013 AUPRC Unit: fraction · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: type: reported plus minus type unresolved; value: 0.013 Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedEnhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Combined, column AUPRC; XML row4 column7 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 0.83 ± 0.045 Sensitivity Unit: fraction · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: type: reported plus minus type unresolved; value: 0.045 Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedEnhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Combined, column Sensitivity; XML row4 column3 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 0.97 AUROC Unit: fraction · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedEnhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Combined, column AUROC; XML row4 column8 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
Evidence table
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
19 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| attributes.comparison.adaptation Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label Context-only references | Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features Table 1.: Val Accuracy, Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Version: preprint version in PMC | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| attributes.comparison.aggregation No value recorded Context-only references | Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features Table 1.: Val Accuracy, Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Version: preprint version in PMC | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| attributes.comparison.budget No value recorded Context-only references | Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features Table 1.: Val Accuracy, Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Version: preprint version in PMC | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| attributes.comparison.dataset_version No value recorded Context-only references | Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features Table 1.: Val Accuracy, Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Version: preprint version in PMC | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| attributes.comparison.inputs No value recorded Context-only references | Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features Table 1.: Val Accuracy, Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Version: preprint version in PMC | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| attributes.comparison.metric_implementation No value recorded Context-only references | Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features Table 1.: Val Accuracy, Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Version: preprint version in PMC | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| attributes.comparison.population No value recorded Context-only references | Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features Table 1.: Val Accuracy, Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Version: preprint version in PMC | missing or unspecified No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| attributes.comparison.protocol_id paper-protocol-a7bf3c8f6b432c3093 Context-only references | Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features Table 1.: Val Accuracy, Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Version: preprint version in PMC | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| attributes.comparison.split 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples. Context-only references | Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features Table 1.: Val Accuracy, Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Version: preprint version in PMC | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| attributes.comparison.subset Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Context-only references | Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features Table 1.: Val Accuracy, Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Version: preprint version in PMC | not individually reviewed No individual claim review recorded author reported Audit detailsField: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
Sources and history
Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: needs review
- Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Original source · preprint version in PMC
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: paper-evaluation-98cb21f610753a0d85
- areas
- proteins-complexes
- tasks
- vaccine-antigen candidate prediction
- origin
- author_reported
- protocol
- Original 509 features vs ESM 1,280 features vs combined 1,789 features. 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples.
- version
- Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label
- comparison
- protocol id: paper-protocol-a7bf3c8f6b432c3093; dataset version: Not reported; split: 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples.; subset: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison; population: Not reported; aggregation: Not reported; inputs: Not reported; adaptation: Paper-specific evaluated pipeline; exact checkpoint not inferred from label; budget: Not reported; metric implementation: Not reported
- source locator
- Table 1.: Val Accuracy, Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
- missing metadata
- checkpoint revision: unextracted; budget: unreported; split manifest: unextracted
Related records
- model: Combined
- benchmark: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison (vaccine-antigen candidate prediction)
- dataset: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
- evaluation: Combined: MCC on Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
- evaluation: Combined: Specificity on Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
- evaluation: Combined: Weighted F1 on Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
- evaluation: Combined: Val Accuracy on Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
- evaluation: Combined: AUPRC on Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
- evaluation: Combined: Sensitivity on Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
- evaluation: Combined: AUROC on Protective-antigen classification feature comparison