Strengths and considerations
No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.
Protocol
Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification (human-versus-viral protein classification)
Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification · Table 1. Compare protein origin classifiers; T 5 embeddings plus linear/tree models vs ESM 2 fine-tuning and simple controls. UniRef90 deduplication; proteins longer than1,600 residues excluded; UniRef50 clusters assigned80% training and20% test with no cluster shared. Separate four-fold error-analysis experiment not assigned toTable1.
Sources
Protein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1: AUC (%), Held-out human-versus-virus protein classificationAt a glance
Inputs, training, access and other details
Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.
| Property | Description and evidence |
|---|---|
| Datasets | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Organisms | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Assays | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Splits | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Allowed inputs | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Adaptation | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Metrics | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Baselines | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
How it works
Evaluation in this paper
Compare protein origin classifiers; T 5 embeddings plus linear/tree models vs ESM 2 fine-tuning and simple controls. UniRef90 deduplication; proteins longer than1,600 residues excluded; UniRef50 clusters assigned80% training and20% test with no cluster shared. Separate four-fold error-analysis experiment not assigned toTable1.
Sources
Protein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1: AUC (%), Held-out human-versus-virus protein classificationEvaluation design
Benchmarks bring together tasks and protocols. A task describes the biological question; a protocol defines a particular test.
These source-backed links do not make different protocols or scores interchangeable.
Recorded evaluations
Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.
- ESM2 650M: human-versus-viral protein classification
- Tree-T5: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification
- BL Length: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification
- AA n-grams: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification
- ESM2 8M: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification
- ESM2 35M: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification
- ESM2 150M: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification
- Linear-T5: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification
Published comparisons
Explore the results reported under one evaluation protocol. Each figure keeps its source, dataset and metric together; it is not a ranking across studies.
Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification · Table 1
AUROC (percent) · Higher values are better for this metric.
Compare protein origin classifiers; T 5 embeddings plus linear/tree models vs ESM 2 fine-tuning and simple controls. UniRef90 deduplication; proteins longer than1,600 residues excluded; UniRef50 clusters assigned80% training and20% test with no cluster shared. Separate four-fold error-analysis experiment not assigned toTable1.
- BL Length · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation61.97
- AA n-grams · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation91.5
- ESM2 8M · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation98.09
- ESM2 35M · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation98.69
- ESM2 150M · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation99.26
- ESM2 650M · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation99.67
- Linear-T5 · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation99.56
- Tree-T5 · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation99.65
Source order is preserved. Plotted marks show point estimates; uncertainty, where reported, is retained in the printed values and table. Differences do not establish statistical significance.
Protein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1: AUC (%), Held-out human-versus-virus protein classificationValues, uncertainty and evidence
| Tested entity | Printed value | Uncertainty | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| BL Length · Configuration | 61.97 percent | Not reported | Author-reported evaluation · source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row BL Length, column AUC (%); XML row2 column2 |
| AA n-grams · Configuration | 91.5 percent | Not reported | Author-reported evaluation · source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row AA n-grams, column AUC (%); XML row3 column2 |
| ESM2 8M · Configuration | 98.09 percent | Not reported | Author-reported evaluation · source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row ESM2 8M, column AUC (%); XML row4 column2 |
| ESM2 35M · Configuration | 98.69 percent | Not reported | Author-reported evaluation · source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row ESM2 35M, column AUC (%); XML row5 column2 |
| ESM2 150M · Configuration | 99.26 percent | Not reported | Author-reported evaluation · source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row ESM2 150M, column AUC (%); XML row6 column2 |
| ESM2 650M · Configuration | 99.67 percent | Not reported | Author-reported evaluation · source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry; Protein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, ESM2 650M row, AUC (%) column |
| Linear-T5 · Configuration | 99.56 percent | Not reported | Author-reported evaluation · source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row Linear-T5, column AUC (%); XML row8 column2 |
| Tree-T5 · Configuration | 99.65 percent | Not reported | Author-reported evaluation · source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row Tree-T5, column AUC (%); XML row9 column2 |
Scope and limitations
- Origin classification does not establish immune mimicry.
- Table footnote says all values are percent but log-loss values are dimensionless; log-loss units quarantined.
- Narrative n-gram AUC91.9 differs from Table1 value91.5; preserve table value.
- No interval assigned unless printed in source cell.
Source transcription and grouping reviewed by automated source review on 2026-09-17. These experiments were not independently reproduced by rewire.
Tested entities and results
Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 8 evaluations · 32 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
| Metric and finding | Coverage and uncertainty | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| ESM2 650M: human-versus-viral protein classification Configuration: ESM2 650MProtocol: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification (human-versus-viral protein classification)Dataset: human and viral proteins Compare protein origin classifiers; T 5 embeddings plus linear/tree models vs ESM 2 fine-tuning and simple controls. UniRef90 deduplication; proteins longer than1,600 residues excluded; UniRef50 clusters assigned80% training and20% test with no cluster shared. Separate four-fold error-analysis experiment not assigned toTable1. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 99.67% AUROC Unit: percent · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry; Protein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, ESM2 650M row, AUC (%) column Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 96.85% Prec. Unit: percent · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row ESM2 650M, column Prec.; XML row7 column4 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 97.86% Accur. Unit: percent · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row ESM2 650M, column Accur.; XML row7 column3 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 96.68% Recall Unit: percent · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row ESM2 650M, column Recall; XML row7 column5 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| ESM2 8M: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification Configuration: ESM2 8MProtocol: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification (human-versus-viral protein classification)Dataset: human and viral proteins Compare protein origin classifiers; T 5 embeddings plus linear/tree models vs ESM 2 fine-tuning and simple controls. UniRef90 deduplication; proteins longer than1,600 residues excluded; UniRef50 clusters assigned80% training and20% test with no cluster shared. Separate four-fold error-analysis experiment not assigned toTable1. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 92.15% Prec. Unit: percent · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row ESM2 8M, column Prec.; XML row4 column4 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 92.33% Recall Unit: percent · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row ESM2 8M, column Recall; XML row4 column5 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 98.09% AUROC Unit: percent · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row ESM2 8M, column AUC (%); XML row4 column2 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| AA n-grams: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification Configuration: AA n-gramsProtocol: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification (human-versus-viral protein classification)Dataset: human and viral proteins Compare protein origin classifiers; T 5 embeddings plus linear/tree models vs ESM 2 fine-tuning and simple controls. UniRef90 deduplication; proteins longer than1,600 residues excluded; UniRef50 clusters assigned80% training and20% test with no cluster shared. Separate four-fold error-analysis experiment not assigned toTable1. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 91.5% AUROC Unit: percent · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row AA n-grams, column AUC (%); XML row3 column2 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 88.49% Prec. Unit: percent · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row AA n-grams, column Prec.; XML row3 column4 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| ESM2 35M: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification Configuration: ESM2 35MProtocol: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification (human-versus-viral protein classification)Dataset: human and viral proteins Compare protein origin classifiers; T 5 embeddings plus linear/tree models vs ESM 2 fine-tuning and simple controls. UniRef90 deduplication; proteins longer than1,600 residues excluded; UniRef50 clusters assigned80% training and20% test with no cluster shared. Separate four-fold error-analysis experiment not assigned toTable1. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 98.69% AUROC Unit: percent · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row ESM2 35M, column AUC (%); XML row5 column2 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 93.81% Prec. Unit: percent · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row ESM2 35M, column Prec.; XML row5 column4 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 93.92% Recall Unit: percent · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row ESM2 35M, column Recall; XML row5 column5 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 95.83% Accur. Unit: percent · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row ESM2 35M, column Accur.; XML row5 column3 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| ESM2 150M: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification Configuration: ESM2 150MProtocol: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification (human-versus-viral protein classification)Dataset: human and viral proteins Compare protein origin classifiers; T 5 embeddings plus linear/tree models vs ESM 2 fine-tuning and simple controls. UniRef90 deduplication; proteins longer than1,600 residues excluded; UniRef50 clusters assigned80% training and20% test with no cluster shared. Separate four-fold error-analysis experiment not assigned toTable1. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 95.54% Prec. Unit: percent · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row ESM2 150M, column Prec.; XML row6 column4 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 96.99% Accur. Unit: percent · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row ESM2 150M, column Accur.; XML row6 column3 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 95.48% Recall Unit: percent · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row ESM2 150M, column Recall; XML row6 column5 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 99.26% AUROC Unit: percent · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row ESM2 150M, column AUC (%); XML row6 column2 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| Tree-T5: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification Configuration: Tree-T5Protocol: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification (human-versus-viral protein classification)Dataset: human and viral proteins Compare protein origin classifiers; T 5 embeddings plus linear/tree models vs ESM 2 fine-tuning and simple controls. UniRef90 deduplication; proteins longer than1,600 residues excluded; UniRef50 clusters assigned80% training and20% test with no cluster shared. Separate four-fold error-analysis experiment not assigned toTable1. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 97.7% Recall Unit: percent · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row Tree-T5, column Recall; XML row9 column5 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 97.7% Accur. Unit: percent · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row Tree-T5, column Accur.; XML row9 column3 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 99.65% AUROC Unit: percent · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row Tree-T5, column AUC (%); XML row9 column2 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| Linear-T5: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification Configuration: Linear-T5Protocol: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification (human-versus-viral protein classification)Dataset: human and viral proteins Compare protein origin classifiers; T 5 embeddings plus linear/tree models vs ESM 2 fine-tuning and simple controls. UniRef90 deduplication; proteins longer than1,600 residues excluded; UniRef50 clusters assigned80% training and20% test with no cluster shared. Separate four-fold error-analysis experiment not assigned toTable1. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 97.57% Recall Unit: percent · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row Linear-T5, column Recall; XML row8 column5 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 97.57% Accur. Unit: percent · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row Linear-T5, column Accur.; XML row8 column3 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| BL Length: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification Configuration: BL LengthProtocol: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification (human-versus-viral protein classification)Dataset: human and viral proteins Compare protein origin classifiers; T 5 embeddings plus linear/tree models vs ESM 2 fine-tuning and simple controls. UniRef90 deduplication; proteins longer than1,600 residues excluded; UniRef50 clusters assigned80% training and20% test with no cluster shared. Separate four-fold error-analysis experiment not assigned toTable1. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 78.5% Accur. Unit: percent · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row BL Length, column Accur.; XML row2 column3 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 78.5% Prec. Unit: percent · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row BL Length, column Prec.; XML row2 column4 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
| 78.5% Recall Unit: percent · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedProtein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Table 1, row BL Length, column Recall; XML row2 column5 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
Papers and result coverage
Last literature check: 2026-09-17. Primary-source discovery and table/protocol screening; source checked is not independently reproduced. Raw acquisitions not automatically numerical publication approval.
| Paper or primary resource | Version | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Protein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry | version of record | Read source DOI: 10.3390/v17091199 |
What is still missing
- Independent batch review before import; preserve existing observation identities.
Search and extraction details
complete comparison tables extracted pending publication review
Searches
- Protein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry primary paper benchmark results
Evidence locations
- Table 1: AUC (%), Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification
Strengths and limitations
Limitations and conditions
No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.
Profile review details
Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction.
Stable record: paper-protocol-1352834b9391c1dacbEvidence table
Inspect claims, sources and review details
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
3 evidence rows matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation in this paper Compare protein origin classifiers; T 5 embeddings plus linear/tree models vs ESM 2 fine-tuning and simple controls. UniRef90 deduplication; proteins longer than1,600 residues excluded; UniRef50 clusters assigned80% training and20% test with no cluster shared. Separate four-fold error-analysis experiment not assigned toTable1. Individual claims | Protein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry Table 1: AUC (%), Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification Version: version of record | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit detailsPrimary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| Introduction Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification · Table 1. Compare protein origin classifiers; T 5 embeddings plus linear/tree models vs ESM 2 fine-tuning and simple controls. UniRef90 deduplication; proteins longer than1,600 residues excluded; UniRef50 clusters assigned80% training and20% test with no cluster shared. Separate four-fold error-analysis experiment not assigned toTable1. Individual claims | Protein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry Table 1: AUC (%), Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification Version: version of record | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit detailsPrimary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
| Relationship: evaluates task reported-task-53506fe386e4a1 Individual claims | Protein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry Table 1: AUC (%), Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification Version: version of record | source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit detailsField: Claim: paper-claim-91e8ca5ec38f180326 Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
Sources and history
Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: needs review
1 source records and release history
- Protein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry · Original source · version of record
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: paper-protocol-1352834b9391c1dacb
- areas
- proteins-complexes
- tasks
- human-versus-viral protein classification
- entity level
- protocol
- protocol
- Compare protein origin classifiers; T 5 embeddings plus linear/tree models vs ESM 2 fine-tuning and simple controls. UniRef90 deduplication; proteins longer than1,600 residues excluded; UniRef50 clusters assigned80% training and20% test with no cluster shared. Separate four-fold error-analysis experiment not assigned toTable1.
- comparison panels
- id: part2-viral-immune-mimicry-2025-viruses-17-01199-t001-3a83e9bebb; title: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification · Table 1; protocol id: paper-protocol-1352834b9391c1dacb; dataset id: reported-dataset-43f24c4dfb7351; metric: AUROC; unit: percent; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-e2941183edbcf0f806; paper-result-088aaf71a44cdc5709; paper-result-a19e0533c00420b50c; paper-result-13ca62957ffa02eef1; paper-result-a541b9f3a77eec62e2; lit-b4-009; paper-result-b740d08b806206779f; paper-result-6536626a03a3ef62f0; source ids: part2-viral-immune-mimicry-2025; source locator: Table 1: AUC (%), Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification; context: Compare protein origin classifiers; T 5 embeddings plus linear/tree models vs ESM 2 fine-tuning and simple controls. UniRef90 deduplication; proteins longer than1,600 residues excluded; UniRef50 clusters assigned80% training and20% test with no cluster shared. Separate four-fold error-analysis experiment not assigned toTable1.; caveats: Origin classification does not establish immune mimicry.; Table footnote says all values are percent but log-loss values are dimensionless; log-loss units quarantined.; Narrative n-gram AUC91.9 differs from Table1 value91.5; preserve table value.; No interval assigned unless printed in source cell.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: part2-viral-immune-mimicry-2025-viruses-17-01199-t001-668a472b03; title: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification · Table 1; protocol id: paper-protocol-1352834b9391c1dacb; dataset id: reported-dataset-43f24c4dfb7351; metric: Accur.; unit: percent; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-91e7ac901444849ecd; paper-result-ca12e3e749c612d6d8; paper-result-ee7f4e8a864f523eaf; paper-result-544d2c1cd2bd46af9b; paper-result-32da435487ad9e4e7b; paper-result-7ffc4775000c61b1e4; paper-result-87b3b45c365edc42f3; paper-result-439ed50c8779070823; source ids: part2-viral-immune-mimicry-2025; source locator: Table 1: Accur., Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification; context: Compare protein origin classifiers; T 5 embeddings plus linear/tree models vs ESM 2 fine-tuning and simple controls. UniRef90 deduplication; proteins longer than1,600 residues excluded; UniRef50 clusters assigned80% training and20% test with no cluster shared. Separate four-fold error-analysis experiment not assigned toTable1.; caveats: Origin classification does not establish immune mimicry.; Table footnote says all values are percent but log-loss values are dimensionless; log-loss units quarantined.; Narrative n-gram AUC91.9 differs from Table1 value91.5; preserve table value.; No interval assigned unless printed in source cell.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: part2-viral-immune-mimicry-2025-viruses-17-01199-t001-e488608662; title: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification · Table 1; protocol id: paper-protocol-1352834b9391c1dacb; dataset id: reported-dataset-43f24c4dfb7351; metric: Prec.; unit: percent; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-a950e05fb8768ed4e8; paper-result-0c1a3836d475c5a506; paper-result-00f7697f28c706f26b; paper-result-1f9cd7bc0d3be4259f; paper-result-24e80b6223e7bd1109; paper-result-0c5e3578112cc7247a; paper-result-c583dfa48d139dadc8; paper-result-f67a4402bb1e2c96ba; source ids: part2-viral-immune-mimicry-2025; source locator: Table 1: Prec., Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification; context: Compare protein origin classifiers; T 5 embeddings plus linear/tree models vs ESM 2 fine-tuning and simple controls. UniRef90 deduplication; proteins longer than1,600 residues excluded; UniRef50 clusters assigned80% training and20% test with no cluster shared. Separate four-fold error-analysis experiment not assigned toTable1.; caveats: Origin classification does not establish immune mimicry.; Table footnote says all values are percent but log-loss values are dimensionless; log-loss units quarantined.; Narrative n-gram AUC91.9 differs from Table1 value91.5; preserve table value.; No interval assigned unless printed in source cell.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: part2-viral-immune-mimicry-2025-viruses-17-01199-t001-a4943fb2ad; title: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification · Table 1; protocol id: paper-protocol-1352834b9391c1dacb; dataset id: reported-dataset-43f24c4dfb7351; metric: Recall; unit: percent; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-b36e1a943ebc5dfb9a; paper-result-ccac699408a1229570; paper-result-4f2c34cb0e09f0167a; paper-result-4014edf9066fc226f1; paper-result-9d9d31080b47613e46; paper-result-a42799c550a1ae61e7; paper-result-67bb8fdb6692f4336f; paper-result-2aafdf0e911ae9cff5; source ids: part2-viral-immune-mimicry-2025; source locator: Table 1: Recall, Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification; context: Compare protein origin classifiers; T 5 embeddings plus linear/tree models vs ESM 2 fine-tuning and simple controls. UniRef90 deduplication; proteins longer than1,600 residues excluded; UniRef50 clusters assigned80% training and20% test with no cluster shared. Separate four-fold error-analysis experiment not assigned toTable1.; caveats: Origin classification does not establish immune mimicry.; Table footnote says all values are percent but log-loss values are dimensionless; log-loss units quarantined.; Narrative n-gram AUC91.9 differs from Table1 value91.5; preserve table value.; No interval assigned unless printed in source cell.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17
- benchmark research
- review date: 2026-09-17; status: complete_comparison_tables_extracted_pending_publication_review; primary sources: part2-viral-immune-mimicry-2025; inspected locators: Table 1: AUC (%), Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification; searched queries: Protein Language Models Expose Viral Immune Mimicry primary paper benchmark results; gaps: Independent batch review before import; preserve existing observation identities.; claim scope: Primary-source discovery and table/protocol screening; source checked is not independently reproduced. Raw acquisitions not automatically numerical publication approval.
- legacy kinds
- benchmark
- entity classification
- review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: The source-backed record identifies a specified evaluated procedure and its dataset/split/scoring context. Classify it as a protocol while preserving version and comparison restrictions.; source ids: part2-viral-immune-mimicry-2025; source locator: Table 1: AUC (%), Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification; ambiguities: None recorded
Related records
- evaluates task: human-versus-viral protein classification
- benchmark: ESM2 650M: human-versus-viral protein classification
- subject: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification (human-versus-viral protein classification): links:evaluates_task:reported-task-53506fe386e4a1
- benchmark: Tree-T5: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification
- benchmark: BL Length: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification
- benchmark: AA n-grams: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification
- benchmark: ESM2 8M: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification
- benchmark: ESM2 35M: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification
- benchmark: ESM2 150M: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification
- benchmark: Linear-T5: Held-out human-versus-virus protein classification