Protocol

Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers (clathrin protein classification)

Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers · Table 3. Conventional classifiers and PLM-CLA compared using paper-selected features. CLA-IND 0.6 independent test from Shoombuatong 2024 dataset; source Table 1 carries cohort counts.

Sources

Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3: ACC, Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers

13 evaluations · 78 metric rows

At a glance

Inputs, training, access and other details

Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-17. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.

Data, procedure and scoring
Property	Description and evidence
Datasets	Not extracted or verified for this record.
Organisms	Not extracted or verified for this record.
Assays	Not extracted or verified for this record.
Splits	Not extracted or verified for this record.
Allowed inputs	Not extracted or verified for this record.
Adaptation	Not extracted or verified for this record.
Metrics	Not extracted or verified for this record.
Baselines	Not extracted or verified for this record.

How it works

Evaluation in this paper

Conventional classifiers and PLM-CLA compared using paper-selected features. CLA-IND 0.6 independent test from Shoombuatong 2024 dataset; source Table 1 carries cohort counts.

Sources

Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3: ACC, Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers

Evaluation design

Benchmarks bring together tasks and protocols. A task describes the biological question; a protocol defines a particular test.

Tasks

clathrin protein classification

These source-backed links do not make different protocols or scores interchangeable.

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Explore all linked results

Published comparisons

Explore the results reported under one evaluation protocol. Each figure keeps its source, dataset and metric together; it is not a ranking across studies.

Comparison and metric

Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers · Table 3

ACC (fraction) · Higher values are better for this metric.

Conventional classifiers and PLM-CLA compared using paper-selected features. CLA-IND 0.6 independent test from Shoombuatong 2024 dataset; source Table 1 carries cohort counts.

Evaluation protocol · Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers

DT · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.715
NB · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.827
PLS · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.849
ADA · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.877
LDA · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.866
RF · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.894
LR · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.877
KNN · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.916
ET · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.888
XGB · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.877
MLP · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.933
SVM · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.927
PLM-CLA · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.961

Source order is preserved. Plotted marks show point estimates; uncertainty, where reported, is retained in the printed values and table. Differences do not establish statistical significance.

Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3: ACC, Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers

Values, uncertainty and evidence

ACC: original source values
Tested entity	Printed value	Uncertainty	Evidence
DT · Configuration	0.715 fraction	Not reported	Author-reported evaluation · source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row DT, column ACC; XML row2 column2
NB · Configuration	0.827 fraction	Not reported	Author-reported evaluation · source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row NB, column ACC; XML row3 column2
PLS · Configuration	0.849 fraction	Not reported	Author-reported evaluation · source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row PLS, column ACC; XML row4 column2
ADA · Configuration	0.877 fraction	Not reported	Author-reported evaluation · source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row ADA, column ACC; XML row5 column2
LDA · Configuration	0.866 fraction	Not reported	Author-reported evaluation · source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row LDA, column ACC; XML row6 column2
RF · Configuration	0.894 fraction	Not reported	Author-reported evaluation · source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row RF, column ACC; XML row7 column2
LR · Configuration	0.877 fraction	Not reported	Author-reported evaluation · source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row LR, column ACC; XML row8 column2
KNN · Configuration	0.916 fraction	Not reported	Author-reported evaluation · source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row KNN, column ACC; XML row9 column2
ET · Configuration	0.888 fraction	Not reported	Author-reported evaluation · source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row ET, column ACC; XML row10 column2
XGB · Configuration	0.877 fraction	Not reported	Author-reported evaluation · source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row XGB, column ACC; XML row11 column2
MLP · Configuration	0.933 fraction	Not reported	Author-reported evaluation · source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row MLP, column ACC; XML row12 column2
SVM · Configuration	0.927 fraction	Not reported	Author-reported evaluation · source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row SVM, column ACC; XML row13 column2
PLM-CLA · Configuration	0.961 fraction	Not reported	Author-reported evaluation · source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row PLM-CLA, column ACC; XML row14 column2

Scope and limitations

Source prose has inconsistent dataset sizes; exact cohort counts left unresolved, not inferred.
Feature-selection and evaluation leakage cannot be excluded by this table alone.
No interval assigned unless printed in source cell.

Source transcription and grouping reviewed by automated source review on 2026-09-17. These experiments were not independently reproduced by rewire.

Tested entities and results

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 13 evaluations · 78 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Evaluation setupMetricEvidence origin

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and finding	Coverage and uncertainty	Evidence
DT: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers Configuration: DTProtocol: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers (clathrin protein classification)Dataset: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers Conventional classifiers and PLM-CLA compared using paper-selected features. CLA-IND 0.6 independent test from Shoombuatong 2024 dataset; source Table 1 carries cohort counts. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review
0.715 ACC Unit: fraction · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row DT, column ACC; XML row2 column2 Source checking is not independent reproduction.
0.551 SP Unit: fraction · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row DT, column SP; XML row2 column4 Source checking is not independent reproduction.
0.726 AUC Unit: fraction · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row DT, column AUC; XML row2 column7 Source checking is not independent reproduction.
RF: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers Configuration: RFProtocol: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers (clathrin protein classification)Dataset: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers Conventional classifiers and PLM-CLA compared using paper-selected features. CLA-IND 0.6 independent test from Shoombuatong 2024 dataset; source Table 1 carries cohort counts. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review
0.884 SP Unit: fraction · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row RF, column SP; XML row7 column4 Source checking is not independent reproduction.
0.912 F1 Unit: fraction · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row RF, column F1; XML row7 column6 Source checking is not independent reproduction.
0.894 ACC Unit: fraction · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row RF, column ACC; XML row7 column2 Source checking is not independent reproduction.
0.959 AUC Unit: fraction · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row RF, column AUC; XML row7 column7 Source checking is not independent reproduction.
PLM-CLA: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers Configuration: PLM-CLAProtocol: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers (clathrin protein classification)Dataset: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers Conventional classifiers and PLM-CLA compared using paper-selected features. CLA-IND 0.6 independent test from Shoombuatong 2024 dataset; source Table 1 carries cohort counts. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review
0.917 MCC Unit: dimensionless · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row PLM-CLA, column MCC; XML row14 column5 Source checking is not independent reproduction.
0.949 F1 Unit: fraction · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row PLM-CLA, column F1; XML row14 column6 Source checking is not independent reproduction.
0.961 ACC Unit: fraction · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row PLM-CLA, column ACC; XML row14 column2 Source checking is not independent reproduction.
PLS: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers Configuration: PLSProtocol: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers (clathrin protein classification)Dataset: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers Conventional classifiers and PLM-CLA compared using paper-selected features. CLA-IND 0.6 independent test from Shoombuatong 2024 dataset; source Table 1 carries cohort counts. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review
0.690 MCC Unit: dimensionless · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row PLS, column MCC; XML row4 column5 Source checking is not independent reproduction.
0.845 SN Unit: fraction · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row PLS, column SN; XML row4 column3 Source checking is not independent reproduction.
LR: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers Configuration: LRProtocol: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers (clathrin protein classification)Dataset: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers Conventional classifiers and PLM-CLA compared using paper-selected features. CLA-IND 0.6 independent test from Shoombuatong 2024 dataset; source Table 1 carries cohort counts. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review
0.747 MCC Unit: dimensionless · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row LR, column MCC; XML row8 column5 Source checking is not independent reproduction.
0.884 SP Unit: fraction · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row LR, column SP; XML row8 column4 Source checking is not independent reproduction.
ADA: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers Configuration: ADAProtocol: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers (clathrin protein classification)Dataset: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers Conventional classifiers and PLM-CLA compared using paper-selected features. CLA-IND 0.6 independent test from Shoombuatong 2024 dataset; source Table 1 carries cohort counts. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review
0.877 ACC Unit: fraction · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row ADA, column ACC; XML row5 column2 Source checking is not independent reproduction.
0.739 MCC Unit: dimensionless · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row ADA, column MCC; XML row5 column5 Source checking is not independent reproduction.
0.918 SN Unit: fraction · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row ADA, column SN; XML row5 column3 Source checking is not independent reproduction.
NB: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers Configuration: NBProtocol: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers (clathrin protein classification)Dataset: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers Conventional classifiers and PLM-CLA compared using paper-selected features. CLA-IND 0.6 independent test from Shoombuatong 2024 dataset; source Table 1 carries cohort counts. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review
0.773 SN Unit: fraction · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row NB, column SN; XML row3 column3 Source checking is not independent reproduction.
0.868 AUC Unit: fraction · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row NB, column AUC; XML row3 column7 Source checking is not independent reproduction.
SVM: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers Configuration: SVMProtocol: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers (clathrin protein classification)Dataset: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers Conventional classifiers and PLM-CLA compared using paper-selected features. CLA-IND 0.6 independent test from Shoombuatong 2024 dataset; source Table 1 carries cohort counts. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review
0.942 F1 Unit: fraction · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row SVM, column F1; XML row13 column6 Source checking is not independent reproduction.
0.964 SN Unit: fraction · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row SVM, column SN; XML row13 column3 Source checking is not independent reproduction.
MLP: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers Configuration: MLPProtocol: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers (clathrin protein classification)Dataset: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers Conventional classifiers and PLM-CLA compared using paper-selected features. CLA-IND 0.6 independent test from Shoombuatong 2024 dataset; source Table 1 carries cohort counts. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review
0.946 F1 Unit: fraction · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row MLP, column F1; XML row12 column6 Source checking is not independent reproduction.
ET: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers Configuration: ETProtocol: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers (clathrin protein classification)Dataset: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers Conventional classifiers and PLM-CLA compared using paper-selected features. CLA-IND 0.6 independent test from Shoombuatong 2024 dataset; source Table 1 carries cohort counts. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review
0.764 MCC Unit: dimensionless · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row ET, column MCC; XML row10 column5 Source checking is not independent reproduction.
XGB: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers Configuration: XGBProtocol: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers (clathrin protein classification)Dataset: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers Conventional classifiers and PLM-CLA compared using paper-selected features. CLA-IND 0.6 independent test from Shoombuatong 2024 dataset; source Table 1 carries cohort counts. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review
0.877 ACC Unit: fraction · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row XGB, column ACC; XML row11 column2 Source checking is not independent reproduction.
0.956 AUC Unit: fraction · Direction: higher	Uncertainty: unreported Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedAdvancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Table 3, row XGB, column AUC; XML row11 column7 Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Papers and result coverage

Last literature check: 2026-09-17. Primary-source discovery and table/protocol screening; source checked is not independently reproduced. Raw acquisitions not automatically numerical publication approval.

Paper or primary resource	Version	Reference
Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models	journal full text in PMC	Read source DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-08510-4

What is still missing

Independent batch review before import; preserve existing observation identities.

Search and extraction details

complete comparison tables extracted pending publication review

Searches

Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models primary paper benchmark results

Evidence locations

Table 3: ACC, Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers

Strengths and limitations

Strengths and considerations

No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.

Limitations and conditions

No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.

Profile review details

Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction.

Stable record: paper-protocol-bbffa94da73852557b

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

3 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76
Property and statement	Original source and location	Review and provenance
Evaluation in this paper Conventional classifiers and PLM-CLA compared using paper-selected features. CLA-IND 0.6 independent test from Shoombuatong 2024 dataset; source Table 1 carries cohort counts. Individual claims	Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models Original source ↗ Table 3: ACC, Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers Version: journal full text in PMC Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:20.050842+00:00	source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit details Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction. Field: `attributes.profile.sections.0.body` Source artifact SHA-256: `2edc86b25707c1b737d26117093ce8d856e79cc5d0b335f27c1c341f887f1c7e` Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. Inspected artifact
Introduction Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers · Table 3. Conventional classifiers and PLM-CLA compared using paper-selected features. CLA-IND 0.6 independent test from Shoombuatong 2024 dataset; source Table 1 carries cohort counts. Individual claims	Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models Original source ↗ Table 3: ACC, Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers Version: journal full text in PMC Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:20.050842+00:00	source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit details Primary-source transcription and separate automated review. No human sign-off or experimental reproduction. Field: `attributes.profile.summary` Source artifact SHA-256: `2edc86b25707c1b737d26117093ce8d856e79cc5d0b335f27c1c341f887f1c7e` Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. Inspected artifact
Relationship: evaluates task reported-task-786c09824e9bf5 Individual claims	Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models Original source ↗ Table 3: ACC, Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers Version: journal full text in PMC Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:20.050842+00:00	source checked automated source review · 2026-09-17 Audit details Field: `links:evaluates_task:reported-task-786c09824e9bf5` Claim: paper-claim-52fb2ef2e7e3f35086 Source artifact SHA-256: `2edc86b25707c1b737d26117093ce8d856e79cc5d0b335f27c1c341f887f1c7e` Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. Inspected artifact

All evidence (CSV)All evidence (JSONL)How to read the evidence

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: needs review

1 source records and release history

Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models · Original source · journal full text in PMC

Download this release

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: paper-protocol-bbffa94da73852557b

areas: proteins-complexes
tasks: clathrin protein classification
entity level: protocol
protocol: Conventional classifiers and PLM-CLA compared using paper-selected features. CLA-IND 0.6 independent test from Shoombuatong 2024 dataset; source Table 1 carries cohort counts.
comparison panels: id: part2-clathrin-plm-2025-Tab3-7ef65949fa; title: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers · Table 3; protocol id: paper-protocol-bbffa94da73852557b; dataset id: paper-dataset-a1836de18515f3ab55; metric: ACC; unit: fraction; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-0730029c96e20b98de; paper-result-a55f9924436b4f2946; paper-result-6d26a3281ddec02ba6; paper-result-199f6ba07b9c097f4f; paper-result-644ae2f042fb2f5b23; paper-result-36ae69af478636d799; paper-result-7ed01313e3f4c28c40; paper-result-7195f65c3684098379; paper-result-a969b52eed01ab25da; paper-result-4cf9ff8fa7d95ed4ce; paper-result-e677c183db2fc0a6fe; paper-result-f444ed165adbeb9c85; paper-result-48b062f1f39640cb79; source ids: part2-clathrin-plm-2025; source locator: Table 3: ACC, Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers; context: Conventional classifiers and PLM-CLA compared using paper-selected features. CLA-IND 0.6 independent test from Shoombuatong 2024 dataset; source Table 1 carries cohort counts.; caveats: Source prose has inconsistent dataset sizes; exact cohort counts left unresolved, not inferred.; Feature-selection and evaluation leakage cannot be excluded by this table alone.; No interval assigned unless printed in source cell.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: part2-clathrin-plm-2025-Tab3-9059dcb8eb; title: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers · Table 3; protocol id: paper-protocol-bbffa94da73852557b; dataset id: paper-dataset-a1836de18515f3ab55; metric: SN; unit: fraction; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-7e844e0a18dfd2a35b; paper-result-1d8775900e322544d5; paper-result-14af9ff7e7145d4d29; paper-result-2691b7b496a2b70805; paper-result-8a421ada6b63ee530d; paper-result-9824c5bbad9176ec8e; paper-result-5667de2e439b758d52; paper-result-c5b318cd60d0cdb4a7; paper-result-ac6a602d275b3fea3c; paper-result-5a7ce3c38ddae8961d; paper-result-a2a2ddd6bf8f13daef; paper-result-387a61f6d26366959d; paper-result-d62014e2f2c00f0b19; source ids: part2-clathrin-plm-2025; source locator: Table 3: SN, Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers; context: Conventional classifiers and PLM-CLA compared using paper-selected features. CLA-IND 0.6 independent test from Shoombuatong 2024 dataset; source Table 1 carries cohort counts.; caveats: Source prose has inconsistent dataset sizes; exact cohort counts left unresolved, not inferred.; Feature-selection and evaluation leakage cannot be excluded by this table alone.; No interval assigned unless printed in source cell.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: part2-clathrin-plm-2025-Tab3-1637766aec; title: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers · Table 3; protocol id: paper-protocol-bbffa94da73852557b; dataset id: paper-dataset-a1836de18515f3ab55; metric: SP; unit: fraction; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-21feace8cb2ce5e3eb; paper-result-e33d8392c76daadbc3; paper-result-97cc71a9c8b17a8bc1; paper-result-667c1dd0ce262e830c; paper-result-f1e415b2cfba651012; paper-result-0ce650036f050c2762; paper-result-21c44a4182b8225eb1; paper-result-a2d81dd3a62697406b; paper-result-7c339a10051c86a7c0; paper-result-ea67a0b7b24f3bb052; paper-result-9bdbc84d434b285e04; paper-result-87b08711535c28932a; paper-result-d04ecf04da1004cff8; source ids: part2-clathrin-plm-2025; source locator: Table 3: SP, Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers; context: Conventional classifiers and PLM-CLA compared using paper-selected features. CLA-IND 0.6 independent test from Shoombuatong 2024 dataset; source Table 1 carries cohort counts.; caveats: Source prose has inconsistent dataset sizes; exact cohort counts left unresolved, not inferred.; Feature-selection and evaluation leakage cannot be excluded by this table alone.; No interval assigned unless printed in source cell.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: part2-clathrin-plm-2025-Tab3-657b713876; title: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers · Table 3; protocol id: paper-protocol-bbffa94da73852557b; dataset id: paper-dataset-a1836de18515f3ab55; metric: MCC; unit: dimensionless; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-a4a56a5352e1f4b25f; paper-result-655c72140d737d23c3; paper-result-1482c92aa694d2f027; paper-result-250b4aaac43175427d; paper-result-ddc5d5b4d806f5d683; paper-result-92d64dfea940c8e704; paper-result-1671d2e2b268f272a5; paper-result-b30374085233a5ee59; paper-result-40e463b7ca62e3c241; paper-result-6644f2850c0d5eb339; paper-result-c9dfd2f1b60d02b3df; paper-result-930a9b4bcf61fbe236; paper-result-12c7518a23c15c58d6; source ids: part2-clathrin-plm-2025; source locator: Table 3: MCC, Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers; context: Conventional classifiers and PLM-CLA compared using paper-selected features. CLA-IND 0.6 independent test from Shoombuatong 2024 dataset; source Table 1 carries cohort counts.; caveats: Source prose has inconsistent dataset sizes; exact cohort counts left unresolved, not inferred.; Feature-selection and evaluation leakage cannot be excluded by this table alone.; No interval assigned unless printed in source cell.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: part2-clathrin-plm-2025-Tab3-a89d53b495; title: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers · Table 3; protocol id: paper-protocol-bbffa94da73852557b; dataset id: paper-dataset-a1836de18515f3ab55; metric: F1; unit: fraction; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-f92d473cd400e9e621; paper-result-96f846d80898fae95b; paper-result-9b9e600ad2446e697f; paper-result-af17b84609852bd79e; paper-result-5a6bc1834630e501e8; paper-result-2d7b6ae84bb35ea892; paper-result-a5bbea217db4b4a850; paper-result-d35402f96201b16bf8; paper-result-b30dbb80fd831aad99; paper-result-798a21dedf23053ac0; paper-result-3e7012cff605fa9f7f; paper-result-3431e8053e5b0bad25; paper-result-2b3a797967cdef7a15; source ids: part2-clathrin-plm-2025; source locator: Table 3: F1, Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers; context: Conventional classifiers and PLM-CLA compared using paper-selected features. CLA-IND 0.6 independent test from Shoombuatong 2024 dataset; source Table 1 carries cohort counts.; caveats: Source prose has inconsistent dataset sizes; exact cohort counts left unresolved, not inferred.; Feature-selection and evaluation leakage cannot be excluded by this table alone.; No interval assigned unless printed in source cell.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: part2-clathrin-plm-2025-Tab3-b6e9f189ae; title: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers · Table 3; protocol id: paper-protocol-bbffa94da73852557b; dataset id: paper-dataset-a1836de18515f3ab55; metric: AUC; unit: fraction; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-2eaf94777fc7f857fc; paper-result-47d350f89848982a43; paper-result-f1a86ea15cd7479d5b; paper-result-e274031e8e17dc0933; paper-result-ad1e11f4f3b25e62ed; paper-result-3741a0c6925f2947e2; paper-result-ca68d167787e314805; paper-result-7ef5e7bcd2b4a87ef9; paper-result-9565fcdb350e8db673; paper-result-5250d6a1217d2812cf; paper-result-e0a382c956e9add325; paper-result-9c2aeff72feeb82f45; paper-result-ab057b14f1c421f3ca; source ids: part2-clathrin-plm-2025; source locator: Table 3: AUC, Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers; context: Conventional classifiers and PLM-CLA compared using paper-selected features. CLA-IND 0.6 independent test from Shoombuatong 2024 dataset; source Table 1 carries cohort counts.; caveats: Source prose has inconsistent dataset sizes; exact cohort counts left unresolved, not inferred.; Feature-selection and evaluation leakage cannot be excluded by this table alone.; No interval assigned unless printed in source cell.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17
benchmark research: review date: 2026-09-17; status: complete_comparison_tables_extracted_pending_publication_review; primary sources: part2-clathrin-plm-2025; inspected locators: Table 3: ACC, Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers; searched queries: Advancing the accuracy of clathrin protein prediction through multi-source protein language models primary paper benchmark results; gaps: Independent batch review before import; preserve existing observation identities.; claim scope: Primary-source discovery and table/protocol screening; source checked is not independently reproduced. Raw acquisitions not automatically numerical publication approval.
legacy kinds: benchmark
entity classification: review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: The source-backed record identifies a specified evaluated procedure and its dataset/split/scoring context. Classify it as a protocol while preserving version and comparison restrictions.; source ids: part2-clathrin-plm-2025; source locator: Table 3: ACC, Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers; ambiguities: None recorded

Related records

evaluates task: clathrin protein classification
subject: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers (clathrin protein classification): links:evaluates_task:reported-task-786c09824e9bf5
benchmark: RF: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers
benchmark: NB: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers
benchmark: LR: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers
benchmark: SVM: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers
benchmark: PLM-CLA: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers
benchmark: PLS: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers
benchmark: MLP: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers
benchmark: KNN: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers
benchmark: ET: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers
benchmark: LDA: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers
benchmark: DT: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers
benchmark: XGB: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers
benchmark: ADA: Clathrin independent test: selected-embedding classifiers

Suggest a correction