dataset · needs review
CASF-2016
Evaluation results
Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
| Metric and finding | Coverage and uncertainty | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| binding-affinity meta-model: protein-ligand binding affinity prediction Model: binding-affinity meta-model · Benchmark: protein-ligand binding affinity prediction · Dataset: CASF-2016 Sequence-or-structure meta-model; predicts ln(Kd/Ki) using docked and deep-learning components Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 0.777 Pearson correlation Unit: unitless · Direction: unknown | Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedImproved Prediction of Ligand–Protein Binding Affinities by Meta-modeling · Table 4, Meta-models row, CASF-2016 Benchmark > PCC column Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
Sources and history
Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · Record review: needs review
- Improved Prediction of Ligand–Protein Binding Affinities by Meta-modeling · Original source · PMC archival version PMC11632770.1
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: reported-dataset-17132fbabd7683
- areas
- molecular-interactions
- version
- Not reported
- split
- core benchmark
- missing metadata
- version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; accession: not_reported_in_legacy_extract