dataset · needs review

LiPP lipid–protein complexes

Evaluation results

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · 2 evaluations · 2 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Evaluated configurationMetricEvidence origin

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and finding	Coverage and uncertainty	Evidence
Chai-1: Lipid–protein binding pose Model: Chai-1 · Benchmark: Lipid–protein binding pose · Dataset: LiPP lipid–protein complexes Top-scoring pose; all-atom lipid RMSD below 2 Å. Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review
60.7 Success rate, ligand all-atom RMSD <2 Å Unit: % · Direction: unknown	Uncertainty: 95% CI 55.2–66.0 Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedThe LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods · Table 2, Chai-1 row, LiPP (N=331) % Success Rate column Source checking is not independent reproduction.
DiffDock-L: Lipid–protein binding pose Model: DiffDock-L · Benchmark: Lipid–protein binding pose · Dataset: LiPP lipid–protein complexes Top-scoring pose; all-atom lipid RMSD below 2 Å. Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review
46.8 Success rate, ligand all-atom RMSD <2 Å Unit: % · Direction: unknown	Uncertainty: 95% CI 41.3–52.3 Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedThe LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods · Table 2, DiffDock-L row, LiPP (N=331) % Success Rate column Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · Record review: needs review

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: reported-dataset-6a44f5946cd7ab

areas: molecular-interactions
version: 331 complexes
split: Not reported
missing metadata: split: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; accession: not_reported_in_legacy_extract

Related records