Strengths and considerations
No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.
model · method
DiffDock-L
DiffDock-L is the method recorded for Lipid–protein binding pose. This page preserves the configuration reported by The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods.
At a glance
Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. This does not change the review status of its results.
| Property | Description and evidence |
|---|---|
| Recorded dataset | LiPP lipid–protein complexesThe LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods · Table 2, DiffDock-L row, LiPP (N=331) % Success Rate column |
| Model type | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Known versions | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Training data | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Context limits | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Access | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Code licence | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
| Weights licence | Not extracted or verified for this record. |
How it works
Recorded evaluation
The imported evaluation describes this procedure: Top-scoring pose; all-atom lipid RMSD below 2 Å.
The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods · Table 2, DiffDock-L row, LiPP (N=331) % Success Rate columnBenchmarks and results
Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
| Metric and finding | Coverage and uncertainty | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| DiffDock-L: Lipid–protein binding pose Top-scoring pose; all-atom lipid RMSD below 2 Å. Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 46.8 Success rate, ligand all-atom RMSD <2 Å Unit: % · Direction: unknown | Uncertainty: 95% CI 41.3–52.3 Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedThe LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods · Table 2, DiffDock-L row, LiPP (N=331) % Success Rate column Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
Strengths and limitations
Limitations and conditions
- This is an evidence-limited profile. The recorded evaluation context does not establish performance on other datasets or configurations.The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods · Table 2, DiffDock-L row, LiPP (N=331) % Success Rate column
Profile review details
Reviewed the existing release record, its source pointer and linked evaluation context. This is not a fresh full-text architecture review or independent reproduction; numerical review status is unchanged.
Stable record: reported-model-51ed86132346a0Sources and history
Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · Record review: needs review
- The LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods · Original source · PMC13292216.1
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: reported-model-51ed86132346a0
- areas
- molecular-interactions
- entity level
- method
- version
- Not reported
- reported name
- DiffDock-L
- missing metadata
- version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; checkpoint revision: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; training data: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; licence: not_reported_in_legacy_extract