evaluation · needs review

DiffDock-L: Lipid–protein binding pose

Evaluation procedure

Top-scoring pose; all-atom lipid RMSD below 2 Å.

Metadata review: needs review. Unreported conditions prevent automatic comparisons.

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Evaluated configurationMetricEvidence origin

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and finding	Coverage and uncertainty	Evidence
DiffDock-L: Lipid–protein binding pose Model: DiffDock-L · Benchmark: Lipid–protein binding pose · Dataset: LiPP lipid–protein complexes Top-scoring pose; all-atom lipid RMSD below 2 Å. Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review
46.8 Success rate, ligand all-atom RMSD <2 Å Unit: % · Direction: unknown	Uncertainty: 95% CI 41.3–52.3 Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported	source checkedThe LiPP Benchmark Set for Modeling Lipid–Protein Complexes: Comparison of Co-Folding and Docking Methods · Table 2, DiffDock-L row, LiPP (N=331) % Success Rate column Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Release 2026-09-16-d74d282221a9 · Record review: needs review

Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: evaluation-lit-042

areas: molecular-interactions
tasks: Lipid–protein binding pose
origin: independent_paper
protocol: Top-scoring pose; all-atom lipid RMSD below 2 Å.
version: Not reported
comparison: protocol id: Not reported; dataset version: 331 complexes; split: Not reported; population: Not reported; inputs: Not reported; adaptation: Not reported; metric implementation: Not reported; aggregation: Not reported; budget: Not reported
missing metadata: model version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; split: not_reported_in_legacy_extract

Related records