rewire.it
Result

0.96 ± 0.008 Weighted F1

Original: Weighted F1 on Protective-antigen classification feature comparison

Tested configuration
Original
Protocol
Protective-antigen classification feature comparison (vaccine-antigen candidate prediction)
Dataset
Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
Procedure
Original 509 features vs ESM 1,280 features vs combined 1,789 features. 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples.
Evaluation
Original: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
Evidence
Author-reported evaluation · source checkedEnhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Original, column Weighted F1; XML row2 column5

A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: needs review. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.

Evaluation results

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
Original: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison

Original 509 features vs ESM 1,280 features vs combined 1,789 features. 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.96 ± 0.008 Weighted F1

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: type: reported plus minus type unresolved; value: 0.008

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedEnhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Original, column Weighted F1; XML row2 column5

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Reported result

0.96 ± 0.008

Individual claims
Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features

Original source ↗

Table 1., row Original, column Weighted F1; XML row2 column5

Version: preprint version in PMC
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:15.123850+00:00

source checked

Primary-table transcription and separate automated source review · 2026-09-17

author reported

Audit details

Source checked does not mean experimentally reproduced.

Field: attributes.printed_value

Source artifact SHA-256: b76fff917addd0e9ff8a2fc843496132ecf832d3ceef248e3edf2dbc78baab5f

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: source checked

Download this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: paper-result-651ddc5c811de9e8bb

areas
proteins-complexes
tasks
vaccine-antigen candidate prediction
printed value
0.96 ± 0.008
numeric value
0.96
metric
Weighted F1
metric direction
higher
unit
fraction
uncertainty
type: reported_plus_minus_type_unresolved; value: 0.008
eligible count
Not reported
scored count
Not reported
reported population
Not reported
source locator
Table 1., row Original, column Weighted F1; XML row2 column5
source occurrences
source id: part2-vaxign-esm-2024; locator: Table 1., row Original, column Weighted F1; XML row2 column5
review
method: Primary-table transcription and separate automated source review; date: 2026-09-17; note: Source checked does not mean experimentally reproduced.
missing metadata
scored count: unreported; eligible count: unextracted; checkpoint revision: unextracted; uncertainty: inapplicable
Related records

Suggest a correction