0.78 ± 0.046 MCC
Original: MCC on Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
- Tested configuration
- Original
- Protocol
- Protective-antigen classification feature comparison (vaccine-antigen candidate prediction)
- Dataset
- Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
- Procedure
- Original 509 features vs ESM 1,280 features vs combined 1,789 features. 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples.
- Evaluation
- Original: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison
- Evidence
- Author-reported evaluation · source checkedEnhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Original, column MCC; XML row2 column6
A source-checked result verifies the numerical transcription, not every model or protocol detail. Evaluation metadata: needs review. Source checked does not mean independently reproduced.
Evaluation results
Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 1 evaluation · 1 metric row. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.
| Metric and finding | Coverage and uncertainty | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Original: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Configuration: OriginalProtocol: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison (vaccine-antigen candidate prediction)Dataset: Protective-antigen classification feature comparison Original 509 features vs ESM 1,280 features vs combined 1,789 features. 372 protection-positive and 3,720 protection-negative samples. Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review | ||
| 0.78 ± 0.046 MCC Unit: dimensionless · Direction: higher | Uncertainty: type: reported plus minus type unresolved; value: 0.046 Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported | source checkedEnhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Table 1., row Original, column MCC; XML row2 column6 Source checking is not independent reproduction. |
Evidence table
Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.
One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.
1 evidence row matching the loaded filters
| Property and statement | Original source and location | Review and provenance |
|---|---|---|
| Reported result 0.78 ± 0.046 Individual claims | Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features Table 1., row Original, column MCC; XML row2 column6 Version: preprint version in PMC | source checked Primary-table transcription and separate automated source review · 2026-09-17 author reported Audit detailsSource checked does not mean experimentally reproduced. Field: Source artifact SHA-256: Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes. |
Sources and history
Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: source checked
- Enhancing Vaxign-DL for Vaccine Candidate Prediction with added ESM-Generated Features · Original source · preprint version in PMC
Technical metadata and extraction receipts
Stable ID: paper-result-774bc1695cb59c05ac
- areas
- proteins-complexes
- tasks
- vaccine-antigen candidate prediction
- printed value
- 0.78 ± 0.046
- numeric value
- 0.78
- metric
- MCC
- metric direction
- higher
- unit
- dimensionless
- uncertainty
- type: reported_plus_minus_type_unresolved; value: 0.046
- eligible count
- Not reported
- scored count
- Not reported
- reported population
- Not reported
- source locator
- Table 1., row Original, column MCC; XML row2 column6
- source occurrences
- source id: part2-vaxign-esm-2024; locator: Table 1., row Original, column MCC; XML row2 column6
- review
- method: Primary-table transcription and separate automated source review; date: 2026-09-17; note: Source checked does not mean experimentally reproduced.
- missing metadata
- scored count: unreported; eligible count: unextracted; checkpoint revision: unextracted; uncertainty: inapplicable