rewire.it
Task

DART-Eval CTS-K562: Cell-type-specific element classification, K562

Cell-type-specific element classification, K562. Scored with AUROC on ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines. One-against-rest AUROC for K562 accessible elements.

14 evaluations · 14 metric rows

Overview

Cell-type-specific element classification, K562. Scored with AUROC on ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines. One-against-rest AUROC for K562 accessible elements.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluation design

Benchmarks bring together tasks and protocols. A task describes the biological question; a protocol defines a particular test.

Benchmarks

These source-backed links do not make different protocols or scores interchangeable.

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Explore all linked results

Run instructions

No runnable recipe has been reviewed for this task. Dataset access, model requirements, licences and compute requirements must be checked against its sources before execution.

A task describes a biological question. Choose a linked protocol to obtain concrete split and scoring instructions.

Published comparisons

Explore the results reported under one evaluation protocol. Each figure keeps its source, dataset and metric together; it is not a ranking across studies. The pooled view gathers every source table that reports the same metric and names what it does not hold constant.

DART-Eval CTS-K562: Cell-type-specific element classification, K562

auroc (fraction) · Higher values are better for this metric.

Every method DART-Eval reports on Cell-type-specific element classification, K562, scored with AUROC on ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines.

Evaluation protocol · ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines (DART-Eval split)

  1. Caduceus (probed) · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.587
  2. DNABERT-2 (probed) · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.691
  3. GENA-LM (probed) · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.693
  4. HyenaDNA (probed) · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.799
  5. Mistral-DNA (probed) · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.646
  6. Caduceus (fine-tuned) · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.878
  7. DNABERT-2 (fine-tuned) · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.871
  8. GENA-LM (fine-tuned) · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.862
  9. HyenaDNA (fine-tuned) · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.847
  10. Probing-head-like (ab initio) · Method · Author-reported evaluation0.741
  11. ChromBPNet-like (ab initio) · Method · Author-reported evaluation0.848

Source order is preserved. Plotted marks show point estimates; uncertainty, where reported, is retained in the printed values and table. Differences do not establish statistical significance.

DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, column(K562 AUROC)
Values, uncertainty and evidence
auroc: original source values
Tested entityPrinted valueUncertaintyEvidence
Caduceus (probed) · Configuration0.587 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Probed Caduceus), column(CTS-K562)
DNABERT-2 (probed) · Configuration0.691 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Probed DNABERT-2), column(CTS-K562)
GENA-LM (probed) · Configuration0.693 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Probed GENA-LM), column(CTS-K562)
HyenaDNA (probed) · Configuration0.799 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Probed HyenaDNA), column(CTS-K562)
Mistral-DNA (probed) · Configuration0.646 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Probed Mistral-DNA), column(CTS-K562)
Nucleotide Transformer (probed) · Configuration0.711 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Probed Nucleotide Transformer), column(CTS-K562)
Caduceus (fine-tuned) · Configuration0.878 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Fine-Tuned Caduceus), column(CTS-K562)
DNABERT-2 (fine-tuned) · Configuration0.871 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Fine-Tuned DNABERT-2), column(CTS-K562)
GENA-LM (fine-tuned) · Configuration0.862 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Fine-Tuned GENA-LM), column(CTS-K562)
HyenaDNA (fine-tuned) · Configuration0.847 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Fine-Tuned HyenaDNA), column(CTS-K562)
Mistral-DNA (fine-tuned) · Configuration0.710 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Fine-Tuned Mistral-DNA), column(CTS-K562)
Nucleotide Transformer (fine-tuned) · Configuration0.867 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Fine-Tuned Nucleotide Transformer), column(CTS-K562)
Probing-head-like (ab initio) · Method0.741 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Ab initio Probing-head-like), column(CTS-K562)
ChromBPNet-like (ab initio) · Method0.848 fractionNot reportedAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Ab initio ChromBPNet-like), column(CTS-K562)
Scope and limitations
  • Author-reported numbers, source checked but not independently reproduced.
  • The evaluation setting is part of the method name: a zero-shot, probed and fine-tuned run of the same model are different entries.
  • Metrics and datasets differ between tasks, so these figures cannot be averaged into one score.

Source transcription and grouping reviewed by automated source review on 2026-09-18. These experiments were not independently reproduced by rewire.

Tested entities and results

Release 2026-09-17-134cd1815de8 · 14 evaluations · 14 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard. Where several source tables report the same metric, the published comparisons above offer a pooled view that names what it does not hold constant.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
Caduceus (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval CTS-K562: Cell-type-specific element classification, K562

One-against-rest AUROC for K562 accessible elements.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.878 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Fine-Tuned Caduceus), column(CTS-K562)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Caduceus (probed) on DART-Eval CTS-K562: Cell-type-specific element classification, K562

One-against-rest AUROC for K562 accessible elements.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.587 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Probed Caduceus), column(CTS-K562)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

ChromBPNet-like (ab initio) on DART-Eval CTS-K562: Cell-type-specific element classification, K562

One-against-rest AUROC for K562 accessible elements.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.848 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Ab initio ChromBPNet-like), column(CTS-K562)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

DNABERT-2 (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval CTS-K562: Cell-type-specific element classification, K562

One-against-rest AUROC for K562 accessible elements.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.871 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Fine-Tuned DNABERT-2), column(CTS-K562)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

DNABERT-2 (probed) on DART-Eval CTS-K562: Cell-type-specific element classification, K562

One-against-rest AUROC for K562 accessible elements.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.691 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Probed DNABERT-2), column(CTS-K562)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

GENA-LM (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval CTS-K562: Cell-type-specific element classification, K562

One-against-rest AUROC for K562 accessible elements.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.862 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Fine-Tuned GENA-LM), column(CTS-K562)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

GENA-LM (probed) on DART-Eval CTS-K562: Cell-type-specific element classification, K562

One-against-rest AUROC for K562 accessible elements.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.693 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Probed GENA-LM), column(CTS-K562)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

HyenaDNA (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval CTS-K562: Cell-type-specific element classification, K562

One-against-rest AUROC for K562 accessible elements.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.847 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Fine-Tuned HyenaDNA), column(CTS-K562)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

HyenaDNA (probed) on DART-Eval CTS-K562: Cell-type-specific element classification, K562

One-against-rest AUROC for K562 accessible elements.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.799 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Probed HyenaDNA), column(CTS-K562)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Mistral-DNA (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval CTS-K562: Cell-type-specific element classification, K562

One-against-rest AUROC for K562 accessible elements.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.710 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Fine-Tuned Mistral-DNA), column(CTS-K562)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Mistral-DNA (probed) on DART-Eval CTS-K562: Cell-type-specific element classification, K562

One-against-rest AUROC for K562 accessible elements.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.646 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Probed Mistral-DNA), column(CTS-K562)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Nucleotide Transformer (fine-tuned) on DART-Eval CTS-K562: Cell-type-specific element classification, K562

One-against-rest AUROC for K562 accessible elements.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.867 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Fine-Tuned Nucleotide Transformer), column(CTS-K562)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Nucleotide Transformer (probed) on DART-Eval CTS-K562: Cell-type-specific element classification, K562

One-against-rest AUROC for K562 accessible elements.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.711 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Probed Nucleotide Transformer), column(CTS-K562)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Probing-head-like (ab initio) on DART-Eval CTS-K562: Cell-type-specific element classification, K562

One-against-rest AUROC for K562 accessible elements.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.741 auroc

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedDART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA · Table 4, row(Ab initio Probing-head-like), column(CTS-K562)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

1 evidence row matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-134cd1815de8
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Relationship: part of

discovery-benchmark-dart-eval

Individual claims
DART-Eval: A Comprehensive DNA Language Model Evaluation Benchmark on Regulatory DNA

Original source ↗

Table 4, column(K562 AUROC)

Version: 2412.05430v1
Retrieved: 2026-09-17T07:56:09.182117+00:00

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-18

Audit details

Primary-source transcription with no human sign-off and no independent reproduction.

Field: links:part_of:discovery-benchmark-dart-eval

Claim: dart-eval-association-cts-k562

Source artifact SHA-256: 4194b137ba55c9a2c269d119a9afec6ae1bb0feaf17d91433ae483c41221a56b

Hash scope: Exact retrieved primary paper artifact bytes.

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-134cd1815de8 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: dart-eval-task-cts-k562

areas
dna-genomes
tasks
Cell-type-specific element classification, K562
metric
AUROC
metric direction
higher
dataset
ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines
protocol
One-against-rest AUROC for K562 accessible elements.
source locator
Table 4, column(K562 AUROC)
comparison panels
id: dart-eval-panel-cts-k562; title: DART-Eval CTS-K562: Cell-type-specific element classification, K562; protocol id: dart-eval-task-cts-k562; dataset id: dart-eval-dataset-encode-chromatin-accessibility-peaks-in-five-cell-lines; metric: auroc; unit: fraction; direction: higher; result ids: dart-eval-result-caduceus-probed-cts-k562-auroc; dart-eval-result-dnabert-2-probed-cts-k562-auroc; dart-eval-result-gena-lm-probed-cts-k562-auroc; dart-eval-result-hyenadna-probed-cts-k562-auroc; dart-eval-result-mistral-dna-probed-cts-k562-auroc; dart-eval-result-nucleotide-transformer-probed-cts-k562-auroc; dart-eval-result-caduceus-fine-tuned-cts-k562-auroc; dart-eval-result-dnabert-2-fine-tuned-cts-k562-auroc; dart-eval-result-gena-lm-fine-tuned-cts-k562-auroc; dart-eval-result-hyenadna-fine-tuned-cts-k562-auroc; dart-eval-result-mistral-dna-fine-tuned-cts-k562-auroc; dart-eval-result-nucleotide-transformer-fine-tuned-cts-k562-auroc; dart-eval-result-probing-head-like-ab-initio-cts-k562-auroc; dart-eval-result-chrombpnet-like-ab-initio-cts-k562-auroc; source ids: evidence-expansion-p2-evidence-discovery-final-dart-4194b137ba55; source locator: Table 4, column(K562 AUROC); context: Every method DART-Eval reports on Cell-type-specific element classification, K562, scored with AUROC on ENCODE chromatin accessibility peaks in five cell lines.; caveats: Author-reported numbers, source checked but not independently reproduced.; The evaluation setting is part of the method name: a zero-shot, probed and fine-tuned run of the same model are different entries.; Metrics and datasets differ between tasks, so these figures cannot be averaged into one score.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-18
Related records

Suggest a correction