rewire.it
Method

Random Labels

Control run included by Open Problems to bound the scale: perfect labels or random labels, not a competing method.

24 evaluations · 24 metric rows

Overview

Control run included by Open Problems to bound the scale: perfect labels or random labels, not a competing method.

Consult the linked sources for architecture or protocol details. Missing evidence is not evidence of a missing capability.

Evaluations and results

Release 2026-09-17-134cd1815de8 · 24 evaluations · 24 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard. Where several source tables report the same metric, the published comparisons above offer a pooled view that names what it does not hold constant.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
Random Labels on Open Problems label projection CENGEN-BATCH-ACCURACY: Label projection on CeNGEN (split by batch), Accuracy

100k FACS-isolated C. elegans neurons from 17 experiments sequenced on 10x Genomics. Split into train/test by experimental batch. Dimensions: 100955 cells, 22469 genes. 169 cell types (avg. 597±800 cells per cell type).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.014379868184541641 accuracy

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(cengen_batch), method(random_labels), paramset(none), metric(accuracy)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Random Labels on Open Problems label projection CENGEN-BATCH-F1: Label projection on CeNGEN (split by batch), F1 score

100k FACS-isolated C. elegans neurons from 17 experiments sequenced on 10x Genomics. Split into train/test by experimental batch. Dimensions: 100955 cells, 22469 genes. 169 cell types (avg. 597±800 cells per cell type).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.023629520137584254 f1

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(cengen_batch), method(random_labels), paramset(none), metric(f1)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Random Labels on Open Problems label projection CENGEN-BATCH-F1-MACRO: Label projection on CeNGEN (split by batch), Macro F1 score

100k FACS-isolated C. elegans neurons from 17 experiments sequenced on 10x Genomics. Split into train/test by experimental batch. Dimensions: 100955 cells, 22469 genes. 169 cell types (avg. 597±800 cells per cell type).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.002184516197432137 f1-macro

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(cengen_batch), method(random_labels), paramset(none), metric(f1_macro)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Random Labels on Open Problems label projection CENGEN-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on CeNGEN (random split), Accuracy

100k FACS-isolated C. elegans neurons from 17 experiments sequenced on 10x Genomics. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 100955 cells, 22469 genes. 169 cell types avg. 597±800 cells per cell type).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.01655301907303093 accuracy

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(cengen_random), method(random_labels), paramset(none), metric(accuracy)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Random Labels on Open Problems label projection CENGEN-RANDOM-F1: Label projection on CeNGEN (random split), F1 score

100k FACS-isolated C. elegans neurons from 17 experiments sequenced on 10x Genomics. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 100955 cells, 22469 genes. 169 cell types avg. 597±800 cells per cell type).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.016592995002742705 f1

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(cengen_random), method(random_labels), paramset(none), metric(f1)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Random Labels on Open Problems label projection CENGEN-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on CeNGEN (random split), Macro F1 score

100k FACS-isolated C. elegans neurons from 17 experiments sequenced on 10x Genomics. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 100955 cells, 22469 genes. 169 cell types avg. 597±800 cells per cell type).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.005256541593617354 f1-macro

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(cengen_random), method(random_labels), paramset(none), metric(f1_macro)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Random Labels on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-BATCH-ACCURACY: Label projection on Pancreas (by batch), Accuracy

Human pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test by experimental batch. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.21341628347308628 accuracy

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_batch), method(random_labels), paramset(none), metric(accuracy)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Random Labels on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-BATCH-F1: Label projection on Pancreas (by batch), F1 score

Human pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test by experimental batch. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.21414325300594048 f1

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_batch), method(random_labels), paramset(none), metric(f1)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Random Labels on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-BATCH-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Pancreas (by batch), Macro F1 score

Human pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test by experimental batch. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.07072541735434873 f1-macro

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_batch), method(random_labels), paramset(none), metric(f1_macro)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Random Labels on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Pancreas (random split), Accuracy

Human pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.2209726443768997 accuracy

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_random), method(random_labels), paramset(none), metric(accuracy)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Random Labels on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-F1: Label projection on Pancreas (random split), F1 score

Human pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.2207732992070331 f1

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_random), method(random_labels), paramset(none), metric(f1)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Random Labels on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Pancreas (random split), Macro F1 score

Human pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.07618531000986446 f1-macro

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_random), method(random_labels), paramset(none), metric(f1_macro)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Random Labels on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-LABEL-NOISE-ACCURACY: Label projection on Pancreas (random split with label noise), Accuracy

Human pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test randomly with 20% label noise. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.17349768875192603 accuracy

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_random_label_noise), method(random_labels), paramset(none), metric(accuracy)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Random Labels on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-LABEL-NOISE-F1: Label projection on Pancreas (random split with label noise), F1 score

Human pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test randomly with 20% label noise. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.18787809947778522 f1

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_random_label_noise), method(random_labels), paramset(none), metric(f1)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Random Labels on Open Problems label projection PANCREAS-RANDOM-LABEL-NOISE-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Pancreas (random split with label noise), Macro F1 score

Human pancreatic islet scRNA-seq data from 6 datasets across technologies (CEL-seq, CEL-seq2, Smart-seq2, inDrop, Fluidigm C1, and SMARTER-seq). Split into train/test randomly with 20% label noise. Dimensions: 16382 cells, 18771 genes. 14 cell types (avg. 1170±1703 cells per cell type).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.06262558806662334 f1-macro

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(pancreas_random_label_noise), method(random_labels), paramset(none), metric(f1_macro)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Random Labels on Open Problems label projection TABULA-MURIS-SENIS-LUNG-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split), Accuracy

All lung cells from Tabula Muris Senis, a 500k cell-atlas from 18 organs and tissues across the mouse lifespan. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 24540 cells, 17985 genes. 39 cell types (avg. 629±999 cells per cell type).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.08926780341023069 accuracy

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(tabula_muris_senis_lung_random), method(random_labels), paramset(none), metric(accuracy)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Random Labels on Open Problems label projection TABULA-MURIS-SENIS-LUNG-RANDOM-F1: Label projection on Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split), F1 score

All lung cells from Tabula Muris Senis, a 500k cell-atlas from 18 organs and tissues across the mouse lifespan. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 24540 cells, 17985 genes. 39 cell types (avg. 629±999 cells per cell type).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.0892216643742255 f1

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(tabula_muris_senis_lung_random), method(random_labels), paramset(none), metric(f1)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Random Labels on Open Problems label projection TABULA-MURIS-SENIS-LUNG-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Tabula Muris Senis Lung (random split), Macro F1 score

All lung cells from Tabula Muris Senis, a 500k cell-atlas from 18 organs and tissues across the mouse lifespan. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 24540 cells, 17985 genes. 39 cell types (avg. 629±999 cells per cell type).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.025324511313610666 f1-macro

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(tabula_muris_senis_lung_random), method(random_labels), paramset(none), metric(f1_macro)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Random Labels on Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-LABS-ACCURACY: Label projection on Zebrafish (by laboratory), Accuracy

90k cells from zebrafish embryos throughout the first day of development, with and without a knockout of chordin, an important developmental gene. Split into train/test by laboratory. Dimensions: 26022 cells, 25258 genes. 24 cell types (avg. 1084±1156 cells per cell type).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.027831841183339822 accuracy

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(zebrafish_labs), method(random_labels), paramset(none), metric(accuracy)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Random Labels on Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-LABS-F1: Label projection on Zebrafish (by laboratory), F1 score

90k cells from zebrafish embryos throughout the first day of development, with and without a knockout of chordin, an important developmental gene. Split into train/test by laboratory. Dimensions: 26022 cells, 25258 genes. 24 cell types (avg. 1084±1156 cells per cell type).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.03865262268956753 f1

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(zebrafish_labs), method(random_labels), paramset(none), metric(f1)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Random Labels on Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-LABS-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Zebrafish (by laboratory), Macro F1 score

90k cells from zebrafish embryos throughout the first day of development, with and without a knockout of chordin, an important developmental gene. Split into train/test by laboratory. Dimensions: 26022 cells, 25258 genes. 24 cell types (avg. 1084±1156 cells per cell type).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.015063128971038524 f1-macro

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(zebrafish_labs), method(random_labels), paramset(none), metric(f1_macro)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Random Labels on Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-ACCURACY: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Accuracy

90k cells from zebrafish embryos throughout the first day of development, with and without a knockout of chordin, an important developmental gene. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 26022 cells, 25258 genes. 24 cell types (avg. 1084±1156 cells per cell type).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.08739365815931942 accuracy

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(zebrafish_random), method(random_labels), paramset(none), metric(accuracy)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Random Labels on Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-F1: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), F1 score

90k cells from zebrafish embryos throughout the first day of development, with and without a knockout of chordin, an important developmental gene. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 26022 cells, 25258 genes. 24 cell types (avg. 1084±1156 cells per cell type).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.08772691688778744 f1

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(zebrafish_random), method(random_labels), paramset(none), metric(f1)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Random Labels on Open Problems label projection ZEBRAFISH-RANDOM-F1-MACRO: Label projection on Zebrafish (random split), Macro F1 score

90k cells from zebrafish embryos throughout the first day of development, with and without a knockout of chordin, an important developmental gene. Split into train/test randomly. Dimensions: 26022 cells, 25258 genes. 24 cell types (avg. 1084±1156 cells per cell type).

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: source checked

0.0412302425620836 f1-macro

Unit: fraction · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: Not reported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedopenproblems-label primary benchmark evidence · results, dataset(zebrafish_random), method(random_labels), paramset(none), metric(f1_macro)

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

0 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-134cd1815de8
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance

No evidence rows match these filters. Choose another scope or clear the search.

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-134cd1815de8 · Record review: source checked

1 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: open-problems-method-random-labels

areas
cells-tissues
source locator
results, method(random_labels), paramset(none)
missing metadata
checkpoint revision: unreported; parameters: unextracted
Related records

Suggest a correction