rewire.it
Task

protein-small molecule binding-site prediction

Small-molecule binding-site classification evaluates residue predictions on structural and curated protein annotations.

SourcesProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Methods: Evaluation metrics; SJC dataset preparation; UniProtSMB dataset preparation; Discussion; cached text lines 24–25, 35–43, 93; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages

12 evaluations · 45 metric rows

At a glance

Inputs, training, access and other details

Explanatory profile: limited source coverage · Automated source review, 2026-09-16. Review applies to the cited claims; unresolved fields are listed below. Numerical results retain their own review status.

Data, procedure and scoring
PropertyDescription and evidence
DatasetsSJC combines sc-PDB, JOINED and COACH420; UniProtSMB supplies a separately curated binding-site dataset.
SourcesProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Methods: Evaluation metrics; SJC dataset preparation; UniProtSMB dataset preparation; Discussion; cached text lines 24–25, 35–43, 93; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages
SplitsUniProtSMB representative proteins are partitioned 80:10:10 for training, validation and testing.
SourcesProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Methods: Evaluation metrics; SJC dataset preparation; UniProtSMB dataset preparation; Discussion; cached text lines 24–25, 35–43, 93; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages
MetricsPrecision, recall, MCC, AUROC and AUPRC.
SourcesProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Methods: Evaluation metrics; SJC dataset preparation; UniProtSMB dataset preparation; Discussion; cached text lines 24–25, 35–43, 93; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages
BaselinesESM-2 versus ProtBert embeddings and MLP/CNN/Transformer head ablations; some head/model comparisons use the test set.
SourcesProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Methods: Evaluation metrics; SJC dataset preparation; UniProtSMB dataset preparation; Discussion; cached text lines 24–25, 35–43, 93; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages
Leakage controlsProtein similarity clustering and cluster-aware split comparisons are described; ESM-2 pretraining sequences are not universally excluded.
SourcesProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Methods: Evaluation metrics; SJC dataset preparation; UniProtSMB dataset preparation; Discussion; cached text lines 24–25, 35–43, 93; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages
UncertaintyMultiple random seeds are evaluated; the paper reports fold-averaged metrics and standard deviations for its robustness experiment.
SourcesProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Methods: Evaluation metrics; SJC dataset preparation; UniProtSMB dataset preparation; Discussion; cached text lines 24–25, 35–43, 93; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages
Entity typePaper-specific computational evaluation protocol.
SourcesProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Methods: Evaluation metrics; SJC dataset preparation; UniProtSMB dataset preparation; Discussion; cached text lines 24–25, 35–43, 93; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages
OrganismsThe SJC structural collections and UniProtSMB annotations are selected by binding-site evidence and protein redundancy. Their preparation sections and dataset tables do not summarize organism composition or define a species-specific test. · Not reported in inspected sources
SourcesProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · SJC dataset preparation; UniProtSMB dataset preparation; Table 1
AssaysCurated protein–small-molecule binding-site annotations.
SourcesProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Methods: Evaluation metrics; SJC dataset preparation; UniProtSMB dataset preparation; Discussion; cached text lines 24–25, 35–43, 93; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages
Allowed inputsProtein amino-acid sequences.
SourcesProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Methods: Evaluation metrics; SJC dataset preparation; UniProtSMB dataset preparation; Discussion; cached text lines 24–25, 35–43, 93; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages
AdaptationSupervised residue-level predictor fitted on the training proteins.
SourcesProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Methods: Evaluation metrics; SJC dataset preparation; UniProtSMB dataset preparation; Discussion; cached text lines 24–25, 35–43, 93; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages

How it works

How it worksComputational evaluation flow
Computational evaluation flow1. Input: Protein amino-acid sequences.. Then: 2. Evaluation: Supervised residue-level predictor fitted on the training proteins.. Then: 3. Readout: Precision, recall, MCC, AUROC and AUPRC.Computational evaluation flow1. Input: Protein amino-acid sequences.. Then: 2. Evaluation: Supervised residue-level predictor fitted on the training proteins.. Then: 3. Readout: Precision, recall, MCC, AUROC and AUPRC.Computational evaluation flow1. Input: Protein amino-acid sequences.. Then: 2. Evaluation: Supervised residue-level predictor fitted on the training proteins.. Then: 3. Readout: Precision, recall, MCC, AUROC and AUPRC.

Conceptual summary of the cited evaluation; exact task configuration and source version remain part of the protocol.

SourcesProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Methods: Evaluation metrics; SJC dataset preparation; UniProtSMB dataset preparation; Discussion; cached text lines 24–25, 35–43, 93; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages
Evaluation methodology

SJC combines sc-PDB, JOINED and COACH420; UniProtSMB supplies a separately curated binding-site dataset. UniProtSMB representative proteins are partitioned 80:10:10 for training, validation and testing. Precision, recall, MCC, AUROC and AUPRC. ESM-2 versus ProtBert embeddings and MLP/CNN/Transformer head ablations; some head/model comparisons use the test set. Protein similarity clustering and cluster-aware split comparisons are described; ESM-2 pretraining sequences are not universally excluded. Multiple random seeds are evaluated; the paper reports fold-averaged metrics and standard deviations for its robustness experiment.

SourcesProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Methods: Evaluation metrics; SJC dataset preparation; UniProtSMB dataset preparation; Discussion; cached text lines 24–25, 35–43, 93; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages

Evaluation design

Benchmarks bring together tasks and protocols. A task describes the biological question; a protocol defines a particular test.

These source-backed links do not make different protocols or scores interchangeable.

Recorded evaluations

Each evaluation records what was tested and under which conditions.

Published comparisons

Explore the results reported under one evaluation protocol. Each figure keeps its source, dataset and metric together; it is not a ranking across studies.

COACH420, trained on CHEN11 · Recall

Recall (unitless) · Higher values are better for this metric.

Residue-level small-molecule binding-site classification. CHEN11 training, COACH420 test.

Evaluation protocol · COACH420, trained on CHEN11

  1. P2Rank · Configuration · Result quoted from another source0.888
  2. GraphBind · Configuration · Result quoted from another source0.477
  3. CLAPE-SMB · Configuration · Author-reported evaluation0.395 ± 0.066

Source order is preserved. Plotted marks show point estimates; uncertainty, where reported, is retained in the printed values and table. Differences do not establish statistical significance.

Protein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Comparison of CLAPE-SMB with other models trained on CHEN11 and tested on COACH420; Table 2 (Tab2), row 2 P2Rank, column 2: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 Recall; Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 GraphBind, column 2: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 Recall; Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 CLAPE-SMB, column 2: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 Recall
Values, uncertainty and evidence
Recall: original source values
Tested entityPrinted valueUncertaintyEvidence
P2Rank · Configuration0.888 unitlessNot reportedResult quoted from another source · source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 2 (Tab2), row 2 P2Rank, column 2: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 Recall
GraphBind · Configuration0.477 unitlessNot reportedResult quoted from another source · source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 GraphBind, column 2: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 Recall
CLAPE-SMB · Configuration0.395 ± 0.066 unitlessprinted: 0.066; value: 0.066; type: not explicitly identified in inspected table or captionAuthor-reported evaluation · source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 CLAPE-SMB, column 2: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 Recall
Scope and limitations
  • Sequence-only and structure-using predictors have unequal input information and are labelled method comparisons, not architecture-controlled tests. CLAPE-SMB seeds 6,17,35,42; the table prints ± but does not explicitly label the spread in its caption. N/A AUROC remains unavailable. Origins are labelled per method; appearance in one table does not constitute independent replication of every model.

Source transcription and grouping reviewed by automated source review on 2026-09-17. These experiments were not independently reproduced by rewire.

Tested entities and results

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · 12 evaluations · 45 metric rows. Different protocols are not a single leaderboard.

Results grouped by the exact reported evaluation
Metric and findingCoverage and uncertaintyEvidence
CLAPE-SMB with ESM-2: protein-small molecule binding-site prediction

Contrastive CLAPE-SMB binding-site predictor with ESM-2 feature extractor

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.917 AUROC

Unit: fraction · Direction: unknown

Uncertainty: not reported in legacy extract

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 5, ESM-2 / SJC row, AUROC column

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

CLAPE-SMB: SJC test split

Residue-level small-molecule binding-site classification. 80/10/10 train/validation/test partition of nonredundant sequences.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.651 ± 0.016 Precision

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: printed: 0.016; value: 0.016; type: not explicitly identified in inspected table or caption

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 3 (Tab3), row 5 CLAPE-SMB, column 3: SJC test split Precision

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.529 ± 0.004 MCC

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: printed: 0.004; value: 0.004; type: not explicitly identified in inspected table or caption

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 3 (Tab3), row 5 CLAPE-SMB, column 4: SJC test split MCC

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

CLAPE-SMB: COACH420, trained on CHEN11

Residue-level small-molecule binding-site classification. CHEN11 training, COACH420 test.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.876 ± 0.002 AUROC

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: printed: 0.002; value: 0.002; type: not explicitly identified in inspected table or caption

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 CLAPE-SMB, column 5: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 AUROC

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.395 ± 0.066 Recall

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: printed: 0.066; value: 0.066; type: not explicitly identified in inspected table or caption

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 CLAPE-SMB, column 2: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 Recall

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.371 ± 0.009 MCC

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: printed: 0.009; value: 0.009; type: not explicitly identified in inspected table or caption

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 CLAPE-SMB, column 4: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 MCC

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

DeepProSite: UniProtSMB test split

Residue-level small-molecule binding-site classification. 80/10/10 train/validation/test partition of nonredundant sequences.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.490 ± 0.013 Recall

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: printed: 0.013; value: 0.013; type: not explicitly identified in inspected table or caption

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 4 (Tab4), row 4 DeepProSite, column 2: UniProtSMB test split Recall

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

CLAPE-SMB: UniProtSMB test split

Residue-level small-molecule binding-site classification. 80/10/10 train/validation/test partition of nonredundant sequences.

Author-reported evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.743 ± 0.040 Precision

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: printed: 0.040; value: 0.04; type: not explicitly identified in inspected table or caption

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 4 (Tab4), row 5 CLAPE-SMB, column 3: UniProtSMB test split Precision

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.673 ± 0.031 Recall

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: printed: 0.031; value: 0.031; type: not explicitly identified in inspected table or caption

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 4 (Tab4), row 5 CLAPE-SMB, column 2: UniProtSMB test split Recall

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.699 ± 0.004 MCC

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: printed: 0.004; value: 0.004; type: not explicitly identified in inspected table or caption

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 4 (Tab4), row 5 CLAPE-SMB, column 4: UniProtSMB test split MCC

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

GraphBind: UniProtSMB test split

Residue-level small-molecule binding-site classification. 80/10/10 train/validation/test partition of nonredundant sequences.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.932 ± 0.003 AUROC

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: printed: 0.003; value: 0.003; type: not explicitly identified in inspected table or caption

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 4 (Tab4), row 3 GraphBind, column 5: UniProtSMB test split AUROC

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.565 ± 0.020 Recall

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: printed: 0.020; value: 0.02; type: not explicitly identified in inspected table or caption

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 4 (Tab4), row 3 GraphBind, column 2: UniProtSMB test split Recall

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

P2Rank: COACH420, trained on CHEN11

Residue-level small-molecule binding-site classification. CHEN11 training, COACH420 test.

Result quoted from another source · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.079 Precision

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 2 (Tab2), row 2 P2Rank, column 3: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 Precision

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

N/A AUROC

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 2 (Tab2), row 2 P2Rank, column 5: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 AUROC

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

P2Rank: SJC test split

Residue-level small-molecule binding-site classification. 80/10/10 train/validation/test partition of nonredundant sequences.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.660 Recall

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 3 (Tab3), row 2 P2Rank, column 2: SJC test split Recall

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.293 MCC

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 3 (Tab3), row 2 P2Rank, column 4: SJC test split MCC

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

GraphBind: SJC test split

Residue-level small-molecule binding-site classification. 80/10/10 train/validation/test partition of nonredundant sequences.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.486 ± 0.005 MCC

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: printed: 0.005; value: 0.005; type: not explicitly identified in inspected table or caption

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 3 (Tab3), row 3 GraphBind, column 4: SJC test split MCC

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

GraphBind: COACH420, trained on CHEN11

Residue-level small-molecule binding-site classification. CHEN11 training, COACH420 test.

Result quoted from another source · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.477 Recall

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 GraphBind, column 2: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 Recall

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.889 AUROC

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 GraphBind, column 5: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 AUROC

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.303 MCC

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 GraphBind, column 4: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 MCC

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.223 Precision

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 GraphBind, column 3: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 Precision

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

P2Rank: UniProtSMB test split

Residue-level small-molecule binding-site classification. 80/10/10 train/validation/test partition of nonredundant sequences.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

N/A AUROC

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 4 (Tab4), row 2 P2Rank, column 5: UniProtSMB test split AUROC

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.236 MCC

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: unreported

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 4 (Tab4), row 2 P2Rank, column 4: UniProtSMB test split MCC

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

DeepProSite: SJC test split

Residue-level small-molecule binding-site classification. 80/10/10 train/validation/test partition of nonredundant sequences.

Independent external evaluation · Evaluation metadata: needs review

0.458 ± 0.022 Recall

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: printed: 0.022; value: 0.022; type: not explicitly identified in inspected table or caption

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 3 (Tab3), row 4 DeepProSite, column 2: SJC test split Recall

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

0.926 ± 0.002 AUROC

Unit: unitless · Direction: higher

Uncertainty: printed: 0.002; value: 0.002; type: not explicitly identified in inspected table or caption

Scored: Not reported · Eligible: Not reported

source checkedProtein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning · Table 3 (Tab3), row 4 DeepProSite, column 5: SJC test split AUROC

Source checking is not independent reproduction.

Papers and result coverage

Last literature check: 2026-09-17. Dated primary-source discovery and protocol/table screening. Source checking does not mean experimental reproduction. Only separately extracted and independently reviewed numeric batches are publishable.

What is still missing

  • exact checkpoint hashes and per-method scored denominators: Table labels alone do not establish these fields; do not infer checkpoint or scored count from model name or dataset size.
Search and extraction details

complete tables extracted

Searches

  • Protein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning 10.1186/s13321-024-00920-2

Evidence locations

  • Table 2; XML table Tab2
  • Table 3; XML table Tab3
  • Table 4; XML table Tab4

Strengths and limitations

Strengths and considerations

No source-reviewed explanatory claims are recorded here yet.

Limitations and conditions

Profile review details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Stable record: reported-task-b181ed450cdd41

Evidence table

Inspect claims, sources and review details

Trace each statement to its source and review. A context-only reference supports the record generally; it does not verify an individual field. Source checking does not reproduce an experiment.

One row per statement and cited source. Multiple citations are not independent evaluations. Shared locators are labelled explicitly.

17 evidence rows matching the loaded filters

Claims, original sources and review scope · Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76
Property and statementOriginal source and locationReview and provenance
Diagram caption

Conceptual summary of the cited evaluation; exact task configuration and source version remain part of the protocol.

Individual claims
Protein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning

Original source ↗

Methods: Evaluation metrics; SJC dataset preparation; UniProtSMB dataset preparation; Discussion; cached text lines 24–25, 35–43, 93; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:06Z

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.caption

Source artifact SHA-256: 215919244c3dd2dfb0b55fce91c211430fd8d4aee4bb28bd03eab9f4feb73e62

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Diagram steps

["Input: Protein amino-acid sequences.","Evaluation: Supervised residue-level predictor fitted on the training proteins.","Readout: Precision, recall, MCC, AUROC and AUPRC."]

Individual claims
Protein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning

Original source ↗

Methods: Evaluation metrics; SJC dataset preparation; UniProtSMB dataset preparation; Discussion; cached text lines 24–25, 35–43, 93; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:06Z

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.steps

Source artifact SHA-256: 215919244c3dd2dfb0b55fce91c211430fd8d4aee4bb28bd03eab9f4feb73e62

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Diagram title

Computational evaluation flow

Individual claims
Protein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning

Original source ↗

Methods: Evaluation metrics; SJC dataset preparation; UniProtSMB dataset preparation; Discussion; cached text lines 24–25, 35–43, 93; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:06Z

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.diagram.title

Source artifact SHA-256: 215919244c3dd2dfb0b55fce91c211430fd8d4aee4bb28bd03eab9f4feb73e62

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Datasets

SJC combines sc-PDB, JOINED and COACH420; UniProtSMB supplies a separately curated binding-site dataset.

Individual claims
Protein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning

Original source ↗

Methods: Evaluation metrics; SJC dataset preparation; UniProtSMB dataset preparation; Discussion; cached text lines 24–25, 35–43, 93; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:06Z

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.0.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 215919244c3dd2dfb0b55fce91c211430fd8d4aee4bb28bd03eab9f4feb73e62

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Splits

UniProtSMB representative proteins are partitioned 80:10:10 for training, validation and testing.

Individual claims
Protein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning

Original source ↗

Methods: Evaluation metrics; SJC dataset preparation; UniProtSMB dataset preparation; Discussion; cached text lines 24–25, 35–43, 93; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:06Z

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.1.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 215919244c3dd2dfb0b55fce91c211430fd8d4aee4bb28bd03eab9f4feb73e62

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Adaptation

Supervised residue-level predictor fitted on the training proteins.

Individual claims
Protein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning

Original source ↗

Methods: Evaluation metrics; SJC dataset preparation; UniProtSMB dataset preparation; Discussion; cached text lines 24–25, 35–43, 93; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:06Z

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.10.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 215919244c3dd2dfb0b55fce91c211430fd8d4aee4bb28bd03eab9f4feb73e62

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Metrics

Precision, recall, MCC, AUROC and AUPRC.

Individual claims
Protein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning

Original source ↗

Methods: Evaluation metrics; SJC dataset preparation; UniProtSMB dataset preparation; Discussion; cached text lines 24–25, 35–43, 93; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:06Z

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.2.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 215919244c3dd2dfb0b55fce91c211430fd8d4aee4bb28bd03eab9f4feb73e62

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Baselines

ESM-2 versus ProtBert embeddings and MLP/CNN/Transformer head ablations; some head/model comparisons use the test set.

Individual claims
Protein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning

Original source ↗

Methods: Evaluation metrics; SJC dataset preparation; UniProtSMB dataset preparation; Discussion; cached text lines 24–25, 35–43, 93; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:06Z

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.3.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 215919244c3dd2dfb0b55fce91c211430fd8d4aee4bb28bd03eab9f4feb73e62

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Leakage controls

Protein similarity clustering and cluster-aware split comparisons are described; ESM-2 pretraining sequences are not universally excluded.

Individual claims
Protein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning

Original source ↗

Methods: Evaluation metrics; SJC dataset preparation; UniProtSMB dataset preparation; Discussion; cached text lines 24–25, 35–43, 93; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:06Z

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.4.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 215919244c3dd2dfb0b55fce91c211430fd8d4aee4bb28bd03eab9f4feb73e62

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Uncertainty

Multiple random seeds are evaluated; the paper reports fold-averaged metrics and standard deviations for its robustness experiment.

Individual claims
Protein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning

Original source ↗

Methods: Evaluation metrics; SJC dataset preparation; UniProtSMB dataset preparation; Discussion; cached text lines 24–25, 35–43, 93; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages

Version: version of record
Retrieved: 2026-09-16T10:41:06Z

source checked

automated source review · 2026-09-16

Audit details

Relevant full-paper computational evaluation sections, tables/captions and cited supplementary task passages were reviewed. Reporting omissions are scoped to the inspected sources. Original numerical results are unchanged.

Field: attributes.profile.facts.5.value

Source artifact SHA-256: 215919244c3dd2dfb0b55fce91c211430fd8d4aee4bb28bd03eab9f4feb73e62

Hash scope: Hash scope not separately documented; inspect source record

Inspected artifact

Sources and history

Release 2026-09-17-d277315f7d76 · Record review: needs review

2 source records and release historyDownload this release
Technical metadata and extraction receipts

Stable ID: reported-task-b181ed450cdd41

areas
proteins-complexes
tasks
protein-small molecule binding-site prediction
entity level
task
version
Not reported
task
protein-small molecule binding-site prediction
scope note
Paper-specific evaluation task; protocol completeness requires further extraction.
comparison panels
id: clape-smb-2024-tab2-recall; title: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 · Recall; protocol id: paper-protocol-efe21a629d215d8f9a; dataset id: paper-dataset-d71026cdf5608821b0; metric: Recall; unit: unitless; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-cac8b5d6d782329a59; paper-result-519265cd5397a983df; paper-result-8bf20d3347841d493b; source ids: clape-smb-2024; source locator: Comparison of CLAPE-SMB with other models trained on CHEN11 and tested on COACH420; Table 2 (Tab2), row 2 P2Rank, column 2: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 Recall; Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 GraphBind, column 2: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 Recall; Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 CLAPE-SMB, column 2: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 Recall; context: Residue-level small-molecule binding-site classification. CHEN11 training, COACH420 test.; caveats: Sequence-only and structure-using predictors have unequal input information and are labelled method comparisons, not architecture-controlled tests. CLAPE-SMB seeds 6,17,35,42; the table prints ± but does not explicitly label the spread in its caption. N/A AUROC remains unavailable. Origins are labelled per method; appearance in one table does not constitute independent replication of every model.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: clape-smb-2024-tab2-precision; title: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 · Precision; protocol id: paper-protocol-efe21a629d215d8f9a; dataset id: paper-dataset-d71026cdf5608821b0; metric: Precision; unit: unitless; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-2b798318eda882028c; paper-result-9000014b7e3080e2bc; paper-result-cef2f0889aade7c724; source ids: clape-smb-2024; source locator: Comparison of CLAPE-SMB with other models trained on CHEN11 and tested on COACH420; Table 2 (Tab2), row 2 P2Rank, column 3: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 Precision; Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 GraphBind, column 3: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 Precision; Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 CLAPE-SMB, column 3: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 Precision; context: Residue-level small-molecule binding-site classification. CHEN11 training, COACH420 test.; caveats: Sequence-only and structure-using predictors have unequal input information and are labelled method comparisons, not architecture-controlled tests. CLAPE-SMB seeds 6,17,35,42; the table prints ± but does not explicitly label the spread in its caption. N/A AUROC remains unavailable. Origins are labelled per method; appearance in one table does not constitute independent replication of every model.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: clape-smb-2024-tab2-mcc; title: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 · MCC; protocol id: paper-protocol-efe21a629d215d8f9a; dataset id: paper-dataset-d71026cdf5608821b0; metric: MCC; unit: unitless; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-e198855db4ce0af942; paper-result-7c1331725b140d527d; paper-result-941dc460e719b42566; source ids: clape-smb-2024; source locator: Comparison of CLAPE-SMB with other models trained on CHEN11 and tested on COACH420; Table 2 (Tab2), row 2 P2Rank, column 4: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 MCC; Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 GraphBind, column 4: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 MCC; Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 CLAPE-SMB, column 4: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 MCC; context: Residue-level small-molecule binding-site classification. CHEN11 training, COACH420 test.; caveats: Sequence-only and structure-using predictors have unequal input information and are labelled method comparisons, not architecture-controlled tests. CLAPE-SMB seeds 6,17,35,42; the table prints ± but does not explicitly label the spread in its caption. N/A AUROC remains unavailable. Origins are labelled per method; appearance in one table does not constitute independent replication of every model.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: clape-smb-2024-tab2-auroc; title: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 · AUROC; protocol id: paper-protocol-efe21a629d215d8f9a; dataset id: paper-dataset-d71026cdf5608821b0; metric: AUROC; unit: unitless; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-3429737973d4fc729a; paper-result-6dccf13adc1b0316ba; paper-result-061666088fe4993266; source ids: clape-smb-2024; source locator: Comparison of CLAPE-SMB with other models trained on CHEN11 and tested on COACH420; Table 2 (Tab2), row 2 P2Rank, column 5: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 AUROC; Table 2 (Tab2), row 3 GraphBind, column 5: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 AUROC; Table 2 (Tab2), row 4 CLAPE-SMB, column 5: COACH420, trained on CHEN11 AUROC; context: Residue-level small-molecule binding-site classification. CHEN11 training, COACH420 test.; caveats: Sequence-only and structure-using predictors have unequal input information and are labelled method comparisons, not architecture-controlled tests. CLAPE-SMB seeds 6,17,35,42; the table prints ± but does not explicitly label the spread in its caption. N/A AUROC remains unavailable. Origins are labelled per method; appearance in one table does not constitute independent replication of every model.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: clape-smb-2024-tab3-recall; title: SJC test split · Recall; protocol id: paper-protocol-07cf559d2f1f9262e7; dataset id: paper-dataset-623c309e2fb4d39ef8; metric: Recall; unit: unitless; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-3c8603f3a617ae353d; paper-result-b455cc6c453819bf59; paper-result-86b3e09746a262c729; paper-result-f678244aa5db050c82; source ids: clape-smb-2024; source locator: Comparison of CLAPE-SMB with other models on the SJC; Table 3 (Tab3), row 2 P2Rank, column 2: SJC test split Recall; Table 3 (Tab3), row 3 GraphBind, column 2: SJC test split Recall; Table 3 (Tab3), row 4 DeepProSite, column 2: SJC test split Recall; Table 3 (Tab3), row 5 CLAPE-SMB, column 2: SJC test split Recall; context: Residue-level small-molecule binding-site classification. 80/10/10 train/validation/test partition of nonredundant sequences.; caveats: Sequence-only and structure-using predictors have unequal input information and are labelled method comparisons, not architecture-controlled tests. CLAPE-SMB seeds 6,17,35,42; the table prints ± but does not explicitly label the spread in its caption. N/A AUROC remains unavailable. Origins are labelled per method; appearance in one table does not constitute independent replication of every model.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: clape-smb-2024-tab3-precision; title: SJC test split · Precision; protocol id: paper-protocol-07cf559d2f1f9262e7; dataset id: paper-dataset-623c309e2fb4d39ef8; metric: Precision; unit: unitless; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-c76919342c3926a7e8; paper-result-c04870d60a021ac0ed; paper-result-fcf6afead98be8b7bc; paper-result-02b4a5a19b61ad5217; source ids: clape-smb-2024; source locator: Comparison of CLAPE-SMB with other models on the SJC; Table 3 (Tab3), row 2 P2Rank, column 3: SJC test split Precision; Table 3 (Tab3), row 3 GraphBind, column 3: SJC test split Precision; Table 3 (Tab3), row 4 DeepProSite, column 3: SJC test split Precision; Table 3 (Tab3), row 5 CLAPE-SMB, column 3: SJC test split Precision; context: Residue-level small-molecule binding-site classification. 80/10/10 train/validation/test partition of nonredundant sequences.; caveats: Sequence-only and structure-using predictors have unequal input information and are labelled method comparisons, not architecture-controlled tests. CLAPE-SMB seeds 6,17,35,42; the table prints ± but does not explicitly label the spread in its caption. N/A AUROC remains unavailable. Origins are labelled per method; appearance in one table does not constitute independent replication of every model.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: clape-smb-2024-tab3-mcc; title: SJC test split · MCC; protocol id: paper-protocol-07cf559d2f1f9262e7; dataset id: paper-dataset-623c309e2fb4d39ef8; metric: MCC; unit: unitless; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-63c3e75a69cfad040e; paper-result-42d845442e40d9846c; paper-result-bafeb53a23564fc9e5; paper-result-936e56c8fad08e6191; source ids: clape-smb-2024; source locator: Comparison of CLAPE-SMB with other models on the SJC; Table 3 (Tab3), row 2 P2Rank, column 4: SJC test split MCC; Table 3 (Tab3), row 3 GraphBind, column 4: SJC test split MCC; Table 3 (Tab3), row 4 DeepProSite, column 4: SJC test split MCC; Table 3 (Tab3), row 5 CLAPE-SMB, column 4: SJC test split MCC; context: Residue-level small-molecule binding-site classification. 80/10/10 train/validation/test partition of nonredundant sequences.; caveats: Sequence-only and structure-using predictors have unequal input information and are labelled method comparisons, not architecture-controlled tests. CLAPE-SMB seeds 6,17,35,42; the table prints ± but does not explicitly label the spread in its caption. N/A AUROC remains unavailable. Origins are labelled per method; appearance in one table does not constitute independent replication of every model.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: clape-smb-2024-tab3-auroc; title: SJC test split · AUROC; protocol id: paper-protocol-07cf559d2f1f9262e7; dataset id: paper-dataset-623c309e2fb4d39ef8; metric: AUROC; unit: unitless; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-a1b671f27b279cb8b3; paper-result-afdce2cee34b41cf09; paper-result-87d8d792a85dd7223d; paper-result-a337f472f62cd0d12a; source ids: clape-smb-2024; source locator: Comparison of CLAPE-SMB with other models on the SJC; Table 3 (Tab3), row 2 P2Rank, column 5: SJC test split AUROC; Table 3 (Tab3), row 3 GraphBind, column 5: SJC test split AUROC; Table 3 (Tab3), row 4 DeepProSite, column 5: SJC test split AUROC; Table 3 (Tab3), row 5 CLAPE-SMB, column 5: SJC test split AUROC; context: Residue-level small-molecule binding-site classification. 80/10/10 train/validation/test partition of nonredundant sequences.; caveats: Sequence-only and structure-using predictors have unequal input information and are labelled method comparisons, not architecture-controlled tests. CLAPE-SMB seeds 6,17,35,42; the table prints ± but does not explicitly label the spread in its caption. N/A AUROC remains unavailable. Origins are labelled per method; appearance in one table does not constitute independent replication of every model.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: clape-smb-2024-tab4-recall; title: UniProtSMB test split · Recall; protocol id: paper-protocol-89b76bfabd1dfe31a6; dataset id: paper-dataset-7ed13bec749f1e245b; metric: Recall; unit: unitless; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-a52e839c67a23202a9; paper-result-1fef4fca1431b14c73; paper-result-08de771b9d631cbb90; paper-result-114f60a38e97139e57; source ids: clape-smb-2024; source locator: Comparison of CLAPE-SMB with other models on the UniProtSMB; Table 4 (Tab4), row 2 P2Rank, column 2: UniProtSMB test split Recall; Table 4 (Tab4), row 3 GraphBind, column 2: UniProtSMB test split Recall; Table 4 (Tab4), row 4 DeepProSite, column 2: UniProtSMB test split Recall; Table 4 (Tab4), row 5 CLAPE-SMB, column 2: UniProtSMB test split Recall; context: Residue-level small-molecule binding-site classification. 80/10/10 train/validation/test partition of nonredundant sequences.; caveats: Sequence-only and structure-using predictors have unequal input information and are labelled method comparisons, not architecture-controlled tests. CLAPE-SMB seeds 6,17,35,42; the table prints ± but does not explicitly label the spread in its caption. N/A AUROC remains unavailable. Origins are labelled per method; appearance in one table does not constitute independent replication of every model.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: clape-smb-2024-tab4-precision; title: UniProtSMB test split · Precision; protocol id: paper-protocol-89b76bfabd1dfe31a6; dataset id: paper-dataset-7ed13bec749f1e245b; metric: Precision; unit: unitless; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-9d84f8da0854369c5c; paper-result-ba1e3a15b41c7f68e7; paper-result-a1f27fb075923f53e8; paper-result-0cb8ce6c55a8f0597f; source ids: clape-smb-2024; source locator: Comparison of CLAPE-SMB with other models on the UniProtSMB; Table 4 (Tab4), row 2 P2Rank, column 3: UniProtSMB test split Precision; Table 4 (Tab4), row 3 GraphBind, column 3: UniProtSMB test split Precision; Table 4 (Tab4), row 4 DeepProSite, column 3: UniProtSMB test split Precision; Table 4 (Tab4), row 5 CLAPE-SMB, column 3: UniProtSMB test split Precision; context: Residue-level small-molecule binding-site classification. 80/10/10 train/validation/test partition of nonredundant sequences.; caveats: Sequence-only and structure-using predictors have unequal input information and are labelled method comparisons, not architecture-controlled tests. CLAPE-SMB seeds 6,17,35,42; the table prints ± but does not explicitly label the spread in its caption. N/A AUROC remains unavailable. Origins are labelled per method; appearance in one table does not constitute independent replication of every model.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: clape-smb-2024-tab4-mcc; title: UniProtSMB test split · MCC; protocol id: paper-protocol-89b76bfabd1dfe31a6; dataset id: paper-dataset-7ed13bec749f1e245b; metric: MCC; unit: unitless; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-7ed2311155bd397324; paper-result-de34ece35da8021e97; paper-result-ba078e213fdac2e0bf; paper-result-90ff2ad95b57c8f0f6; source ids: clape-smb-2024; source locator: Comparison of CLAPE-SMB with other models on the UniProtSMB; Table 4 (Tab4), row 2 P2Rank, column 4: UniProtSMB test split MCC; Table 4 (Tab4), row 3 GraphBind, column 4: UniProtSMB test split MCC; Table 4 (Tab4), row 4 DeepProSite, column 4: UniProtSMB test split MCC; Table 4 (Tab4), row 5 CLAPE-SMB, column 4: UniProtSMB test split MCC; context: Residue-level small-molecule binding-site classification. 80/10/10 train/validation/test partition of nonredundant sequences.; caveats: Sequence-only and structure-using predictors have unequal input information and are labelled method comparisons, not architecture-controlled tests. CLAPE-SMB seeds 6,17,35,42; the table prints ± but does not explicitly label the spread in its caption. N/A AUROC remains unavailable. Origins are labelled per method; appearance in one table does not constitute independent replication of every model.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17; id: clape-smb-2024-tab4-auroc; title: UniProtSMB test split · AUROC; protocol id: paper-protocol-89b76bfabd1dfe31a6; dataset id: paper-dataset-7ed13bec749f1e245b; metric: AUROC; unit: unitless; direction: higher; result ids: paper-result-7011ff11e364052ff1; paper-result-195480a469229de195; paper-result-d0fa42d3c13fe8ec4d; paper-result-e4602df92496bbb342; source ids: clape-smb-2024; source locator: Comparison of CLAPE-SMB with other models on the UniProtSMB; Table 4 (Tab4), row 2 P2Rank, column 5: UniProtSMB test split AUROC; Table 4 (Tab4), row 3 GraphBind, column 5: UniProtSMB test split AUROC; Table 4 (Tab4), row 4 DeepProSite, column 5: UniProtSMB test split AUROC; Table 4 (Tab4), row 5 CLAPE-SMB, column 5: UniProtSMB test split AUROC; context: Residue-level small-molecule binding-site classification. 80/10/10 train/validation/test partition of nonredundant sequences.; caveats: Sequence-only and structure-using predictors have unequal input information and are labelled method comparisons, not architecture-controlled tests. CLAPE-SMB seeds 6,17,35,42; the table prints ± but does not explicitly label the spread in its caption. N/A AUROC remains unavailable. Origins are labelled per method; appearance in one table does not constitute independent replication of every model.; review: method: automated_source_review; date: 2026-09-17
benchmark research
review date: 2026-09-17; status: complete_tables_extracted; primary sources: evidence-expansion-clape-smb-2024-21591924; inspected locators: Table 2; XML table Tab2; Table 3; XML table Tab3; Table 4; XML table Tab4; searched queries: Protein-small molecule binding site prediction based on a pre-trained protein language model with contrastive learning 10.1186/s13321-024-00920-2; gaps: exact checkpoint hashes and per-method scored denominators: Table labels alone do not establish these fields; do not infer checkpoint or scored count from model name or dataset size.; claim scope: Dated primary-source discovery and protocol/table screening. Source checking does not mean experimental reproduction. Only separately extracted and independently reviewed numeric batches are publishable.
historical missing metadata
protocol version: not_reported_in_legacy_extract; split: not_reported_in_legacy_extract
metadata review scope
historical_missing_metadata preserves the original discovery state. Current descriptive evidence and missingness are recorded in profile.facts; numerical-result review is separate.
legacy kinds
benchmark
entity classification
review date: 2026-09-17; rationale: This source-scoped record identifies the biological prediction task and holds its paper context. Preserve the existing task identity; exact split, model adaptation and scoring remain in linked evaluations or separate protocol records.; source ids: clape-smb-2024; source locator: Methods: Evaluation metrics; SJC dataset preparation; UniProtSMB dataset preparation; Discussion; cached text lines 24–25, 35–43, 93; comparative evaluation and ablation passages; uncertainty/repeat-run/statistical-comparison passages; ambiguities: A paper- or suite-specific task may constrain some inputs or metrics; that alone does not make it interchangeable with a complete versioned protocol. No protocol equivalence is inferred.; Some legacy profile Entity type facts use the generic phrase computational evaluation protocol. That boilerplate is not sufficient to establish a single fixed protocol identity or to merge this task with another protocol record.
Related records

Suggest a correction